Suppr超能文献

评估人工搬运体力需求的方法:一项来自仓储行业的综述与案例研究

Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.

作者信息

Waters T R, Putz-Anderson V, Baron S

机构信息

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Dec;59(12):871-81. doi: 10.1080/15428119891011045.

Abstract

Assessment of the physical demands of potentially hazardous manual material handling (MMH) activities is fundamental to the prevention of disabilities from occupationally related low back pain, a problem costing the nation billions of dollars annually. Although there is a variety of ergonomic assessment methods available for assessing MMH activities, there is a lack of practical information to assist users in choosing the most appropriate assessment methods of a particular job. This article reviews currently available assessment methods and presents case study results of a physically demanding repetitive manual lifting job in two grocery warehouses. The case study will provide a framework for a comparison of the methods and a discussion of relevant application issues designed to assist users in selecting appropriate methods for assessing MMH jobs. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that all of the ergonomic methods were in agreement that the job of grocery selector has a high level of risk for low back pain. Differences between the methods were noted, however, that should be considered when choosing a specific method for a specific application.

摘要

评估潜在危险的手工物料搬运(MMH)活动的体力需求,对于预防因职业相关的下背痛导致的残疾至关重要,这一问题每年给国家造成数十亿美元的损失。尽管有多种用于评估MMH活动的人体工程学评估方法,但缺乏实用信息来帮助用户选择特定工作的最合适评估方法。本文回顾了当前可用的评估方法,并展示了两个杂货仓库中体力要求高的重复性手工搬运工作的案例研究结果。该案例研究将提供一个方法比较的框架,并讨论相关应用问题,旨在帮助用户选择评估MMH工作的合适方法。根据研究结果,得出的结论是,所有人体工程学方法都一致认为杂货分拣员的工作存在较高的下背痛风险。然而,在为特定应用选择特定方法时,应考虑方法之间的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验