• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在“谁说了什么?”范式中解析社会分类

Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm.

作者信息

Klauer K C, Wegener I

机构信息

Psychologisches Institut, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1155-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1155.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1155
PMID:9866182
Abstract

A multinomial model of the "Who said what?" paradigm (S. E. Taylor, S. T. Fiske, N. J. Etcoff, & A. J. Ruderman, 1978) explains the pattern of participants' assignment errors by means of the joint operation of several processes. Specifically, memory for discussion statements, person memory, category memory, and 3 different guessing processes can be accommodated by the model. The model's ability to disentangle these processes is validated in a series of 5 experiments. The model thereby enables a more refined use of the "Who said what?" paradigm in testing theories of social categorization. This is demonstrated in a 6th experiment in which the validated model is applied to the study of the effects of cognitive load on categorization.

摘要

“谁说了什么?”范式的多项式模型(S.E.泰勒、S.T.菲斯克、N.J.埃特科夫和A.J.鲁德曼,1978年)通过几个过程的联合运作来解释参与者分配错误的模式。具体而言,该模型可以容纳对讨论陈述的记忆、人物记忆、类别记忆以及3种不同的猜测过程。该模型区分这些过程的能力在一系列5个实验中得到了验证。该模型从而能够在测试社会分类理论时更精细地运用“谁说了什么?”范式。这在第6个实验中得到了证明,在该实验中,经过验证的模型被应用于研究认知负荷对分类的影响。

相似文献

1
Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm.在“谁说了什么?”范式中解析社会分类
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1155-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1155.
2
Resolving the apparent discrepancy between the incongruency effect and the expectancy-based illusory correlation effect: the TRAP model.解决不一致效应与基于预期的错觉相关效应之间的明显差异:TRAP模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):845-60. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.845.
3
Person memory: the role of traits, group stereotypes, and specific behaviors in the cognitive representation of persons.人物记忆:特质、群体刻板印象和特定行为在人物认知表征中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Apr;50(4):661-75. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.4.661.
4
The dissection of selection in person perception: inhibitory processes in social stereotyping.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Sep;69(3):397-407. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.3.397.
5
Are you looking at me? Eye gaze and person perception.你在看我吗?目光注视与对他人的认知。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):460-4. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00481.
6
"Do I know you?" The role of significant others in general social perception.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Sep;59(3):384-99. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.3.384.
7
A Neural Mechanism of Social Categorization.社会分类的神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;37(23):5711-5721. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3334-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups.个体和群体差异竞争行为的记忆与体验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):953-66. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.953.
9
Same-gender distractors are not so easy to reject: ERP evidence of gender categorization.同性别干扰项不易被拒绝:性别分类的 ERP 证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct;18(5):825-836. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0607-3.
10
The stereotype consistency effect is moderated by group membership and trait valence.刻板印象一致性效应受到群体归属和特质效价的调节。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan-Feb;153(1):51-61. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.703710.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender categorization and memory in transgender and cisgender people.跨性别者和顺性别者的性别分类与记忆
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;116. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104691. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Social inattentional blindness to idea stealing in meetings.会议中对窃取创意的社会忽视
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):8060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56905-6.
3
Attitude Formation in More- and Less-Complex Social Environments.在复杂程度较高和较低的社会环境中态度的形成。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Oct;51(10):1987-2001. doi: 10.1177/01461672241235387. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
4
Linguistic identity as a modulator of gaze cueing of attention.语言身份作为注意的目光线索引导的调节因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37875-7.
5
Language as a cue for social categorization in bilingual communities.语言作为双语社区中社会分类的线索。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0276334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276334. eCollection 2022.
6
Face mask use as a categorical dimension in social perception.口罩使用作为社会感知中的类别维度。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22772-2.
7
Relationship Between Item and Source Memory: Explanation of Connection-Strength Model.项目记忆与源记忆之间的关系:连接强度模型的解释
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:691577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691577. eCollection 2021.
8
Dimensions of social categorization: Inside the role of language.社会分类的维度:语言的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254513. eCollection 2021.
9
Early detection of language categories in face perception.面孔知觉中语言类别的早期检测。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 6;11(1):9715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89007-8.
10
ASIA: Automated Social Identity Assessment using linguistic style.亚洲:使用语言风格的自动化社会认同评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1762-1781. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01511-3. Epub 2021 Feb 11.