• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景噪声对短声诱发耳声发射的影响。

Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

作者信息

Rhoades K, McPherson B, Smyth V, Kei J, Baglioni A

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1998 Dec;19(6):450-62. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199812000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-199812000-00006
PMID:9867293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of increased levels of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) recordings and to compare the effectiveness of the default CEOAE program with the QuickScreen CEOAE program in increased levels of noise, using an Otodynamics ILO88 recording device.

DESIGN

The right ears of 40 young adult women with normal hearing were assessed using CEOAEs under four different noise conditions and with two different methods of data collection. The noise conditions were in quiet, 50 dB A, 55 dB A, and 60 dB A of white noise. Data were collected at each noise level in the default mode and also using the ILO88 QuickScreen program.

RESULTS

There was a significant change in a number of important CEOAE output parameters with increased noise. In the default mode, mean whole wave reproducibility was 89.2% in quiet but declined to 85% with 50 dB A of white noise, 65% at 55 dB A and 20% at 60 dB A. The QuickScreen program proved more robust to the effects of noise than the default. In that mode, mean whole wave reproducibility was 91.7% in quiet, 92.5% with 50 dB A of white noise, 82.5% at 55 dB A and 45% at 60 dB A.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the study indicate ambient noise levels for accurate CEOAE recording should not exceed 50 to 55 dB A of noise and alternatives to the default program should be considered in non-sound-treated situations.

摘要

目的

使用Otodynamics ILO88记录设备,研究背景噪声水平增加对短声诱发耳声发射(CEOAE)记录的影响,并比较默认CEOAE程序与QuickScreen CEOAE程序在噪声水平增加时的有效性。

设计

对40名听力正常的年轻成年女性的右耳,在四种不同噪声条件下并采用两种不同数据收集方法,使用CEOAE进行评估。噪声条件为安静环境、50 dB A、55 dB A和60 dB A的白噪声。在每种噪声水平下,分别以默认模式和使用ILO88 QuickScreen程序收集数据。

结果

随着噪声增加,一些重要的CEOAE输出参数发生了显著变化。在默认模式下,安静环境中平均全波重复性为89.2%,但在50 dB A白噪声时降至85%,55 dB A时为65%,60 dB A时为20%。结果证明QuickScreen程序比默认程序对噪声影响的耐受性更强。在该模式下,安静环境中平均全波重复性为91.7%,50 dB A白噪声时为92.5%,55 dB A时为82.5%,60 dB A时为45%。

结论

该研究结果表明,进行准确CEOAE记录时的环境噪声水平不应超过50至55 dB A,在未进行声学处理的情况下,应考虑使用默认程序以外的其他程序。

相似文献

1
Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.背景噪声对短声诱发耳声发射的影响。
Ear Hear. 1998 Dec;19(6):450-62. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199812000-00006.
2
Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss.噪声性耳声发射损失,伴或不伴有听力损失。
Ear Hear. 1995 Dec;16(6):612-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199512000-00007.
3
Time-windowing of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions to increase signal-to-noise ratio.
Ear Hear. 1995 Dec;16(6):599-611. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199512000-00006.
4
Frequency-specific information from click evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失中瞬态诱发耳声发射的频率特异性信息。
Audiology. 1999 Sep-Oct;38(5):243-50. doi: 10.3109/00206099909073029.
5
Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.基于 click-evoked otoacoustic emission 的内侧橄榄耳蜗传出神经功能测试的可重复性。
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):789-98. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182944c04.
6
"Linear" and "derived" otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study.
Ear Hear. 2001 Jun;22(3):182-90. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200106000-00002.
7
Effects of speech babble on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 Jul-Aug;12(7):371-8.
8
Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Med J Aust. 1998;169(11-12):588-92. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb123426.x.
9
Evaluation of a noise reduction system for the assessment of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jul;112(1):164-71. doi: 10.1121/1.1488138.
10
Sensitive detection of noise-induced damage in human subjects using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.利用瞬态诱发耳声发射对人类受试者噪声诱发损伤进行灵敏检测。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1998;52(1):19-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Otoacoustic Emissions Testing to Identify Hearing Loss in the ICU: A Feasibility Study.耳声发射测试用于识别重症监护病房中的听力损失:一项可行性研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 3;7(3):e1223. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001223. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.
2
Test and retest reliability of objective screening tests in neonatal hearing screening program in developing countries.发展中国家新生儿听力筛查项目中客观筛查测试的重测信度。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr;282(4):1843-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09085-y. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Status of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in the State of Tamil Nadu, India.
印度泰米尔纳德邦新生儿听力筛查项目的现状
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):639-650. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02444-9. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
4
Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care.南非初级保健中新生儿听力普遍筛查的评估
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015 May 21;7(1):769. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.769.
5
Effects of background noise on recording of portable transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening.背景噪声对新生儿听力筛查中便携瞬态诱发耳声发射记录的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Apr;267(4):495-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1080-y. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
6
Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates: normative data.新生儿短纯音诱发耳声发射:规范数据。
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2008 Apr 17;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-8-3.
7
Effects of noise on transient-evoked oto-acoustic emission pass/fail criteria.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002 May;40(3):278-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02344208.
8
Modification of the wavelet method used in transiently evoked otoacoustic emission pass/fail criterion to increase its accuracy.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002 Jan;40(1):34-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02347693.