Parker S A, Serrats A F
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34(1-4):71-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01405864.
Serial memory testings of 108 head injury cases were studied over a two year follow up period. The length of the post-traumatic disorientation period (PTD) was found to be an important factor in the rate of memory recovery. In the first year after injury marked differences were seen in the recovery rates of all four PTD groups, the three short PTD groups (less than one month) finally yielding from 74% to 92% cases (according to the group) with normal memory function, while the long PTD group (more than one month) only produced 45% cases (statistical significance 0.05). During the second year and up to the end of this survey relatively little change in memory status occurred in any of the cases, regardless of their PTD. Any improvement that did occur was at an extremely slow rate. Brain damage was the main cause of memory defect in the long PTD group, while anxiety symptoms had a more important role in the short PTD cases. The shapes of memory recall curves were analysed in recovering patients. Three types of curve were found. The incidence of the shape of the curve also varied according to the PTD time (statistical significance 0.05) between long and short PTD groups. Curve shapes are discussed in terms of memory mechanisms, and a possible prognostic value is suggested. Analysis of test errors indicated not only a defective transfer of material from short term long term memory storage but also in some cases, a more complex mechanism involving inappropriate fixation of attention. Reverberation of memory traces is suggested as being a possible cause of interference in both short and long term memory mechanisms. A marked difference in recall performance between auditory and visual presentation of word lists was found to be a useful lateralising sign.
在两年的随访期内,对108例头部受伤病例进行了系列记忆测试。发现创伤后定向障碍期(PTD)的时长是记忆恢复率的一个重要因素。受伤后的第一年,所有四个PTD组的恢复率存在显著差异,三个短PTD组(少于1个月)最终有74%至92%的病例(依组别而定)记忆功能恢复正常,而长PTD组(超过1个月)仅有45%的病例恢复正常(统计学显著性为0.05)。在第二年直至本次调查结束,任何病例的记忆状态变化相对较小,无论其PTD时长如何。即便有改善,也是极其缓慢的。脑损伤是长PTD组记忆缺陷的主要原因,而焦虑症状在短PTD病例中作用更为重要。对恢复中的患者的记忆回忆曲线形状进行了分析。发现了三种类型的曲线。曲线形状的发生率在长、短PTD组之间也因PTD时间不同而有所变化(统计学显著性为0.05)。从记忆机制的角度对曲线形状进行了讨论,并提出了一种可能的预后价值。对测试错误的分析表明,不仅存在从短期到长期记忆存储的材料转移缺陷,而且在某些情况下,还存在一种更复杂的机制,涉及注意力的不适当集中。记忆痕迹的回响被认为可能是短期和长期记忆机制中干扰的一个原因。发现单词列表的听觉和视觉呈现方式在回忆表现上存在显著差异,这是一个有用的定位体征。