Suppr超能文献

非开胸植入式除颤器导线的起搏阈值升高:对电池寿命和安全 margin 的影响。 (注:这里“margin of safety”直译为“安全边际”,在医学语境中可意译为“安全余量”等,因原文未明确具体准确中文表述,故保留英文并括号注明,供参考。)

Pacing threshold increase in nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator leads: implications for battery longevity and margin of safety.

作者信息

Epstein A E, Plumb V J, Kirk K A, Kay G N

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294-0006, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;1(2):131-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1009703115240.

Abstract

Just as a stable defibrillation threshold is required for implantable defibrillators to maintain efficacy and a margin of safety for the conversion of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, a stable pacing threshold is also required to provide bradycardia support and pacing to terminate ventricular tachycardias. This article reports the temporal course of pacing thresholds in patients treated with a tripolar, tined endocardial defibrillator lead capable of bipolar sensing and pacing, and defibrillation. Seventeen patients who underwent implantation of an implantable defibrillator system using an integrated bipolar pacing/sensing system were prospectively studied over 18 months. There were 16 males and one female, with a mean age of 69 +/- 5 years (range 61-75 years). At implantation, predischarge, and every 2 months thereafter, the pacing pulse-width threshold was tested at both 2.5 and 5.0 V stimulus amplitudes. After a mean follow-up of 363 +/- 173 days (range 34-597 days), the pacing threshold increased from 0.08 +/- 0.08 ms to 0.5 +/- 0.3 ms at the 2.5 V amplitude (p < or = 0.01, CI-0.57 to -0.27) and from 0.04 +/- 0.02 ms to 0.25 +/- 0.14 ms at the 5.0 V amplitude (p < or = 0.01, CI -0.28 to -0.14). Eight of the 17 patients (47%) received spontaneous implantable defibrillator shocks for clinically detected arrhythmias, and the total number of joules delivered via the leads did not correlate with the pacing threshold changes. We conclude that the pacing threshold for the nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead system studied is not stable and increases with time. This finding has implications for defibrillator battery life in patients who use implantable defibrillators for bradycardia pacing.

摘要

正如植入式除颤器需要稳定的除颤阈值来维持疗效以及为危及生命的室性心律失常的转复提供安全边际一样,也需要稳定的起搏阈值来提供心动过缓支持以及起搏以终止室性心动过速。本文报告了使用能够进行双极感知、起搏和除颤的三极、带倒刺心内膜除颤导线治疗的患者起搏阈值的时间变化过程。对17例使用集成双极起搏/感知系统植入植入式除颤器系统的患者进行了为期18个月的前瞻性研究。其中男性16例,女性1例,平均年龄69±5岁(范围61 - 75岁)。在植入时、放电前以及此后每2个月,在2.5 V和5.0 V刺激幅度下测试起搏脉冲宽度阈值。平均随访363±173天(范围34 - 597天)后,在2.5 V幅度下,起搏阈值从0.08±0.08 ms增加到0.5±0.3 ms(p≤0.01,可信区间 - 0.57至 - 0.27),在5.0 V幅度下从0.04±0.02 ms增加到0.25±0.14 ms(p≤0.01,可信区间 - 0.28至 - 0.14)。17例患者中有8例(47%)因临床检测到的心律失常接受了植入式除颤器的自发电击,通过导线输送的总焦耳数与起搏阈值变化无关。我们得出结论,所研究的非开胸植入式除颤导线系统的起搏阈值不稳定且随时间增加。这一发现对于使用植入式除颤器进行心动过缓起搏的患者的除颤器电池寿命具有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验