Suppr超能文献

双相波除颤对心室起搏阈值影响的前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of the effect of biphasic waveform defibrillation on ventricular pacing thresholds.

作者信息

Kudenchuk P J, Poole J E, Dolack G L, Gleva M J, Anderson J, Troutman C, Bardy G H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-6422, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 May;8(5):485-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00816.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Significant increases in ventricular pacing threshold have been observed following monophasic waveform ventricular defibrillation shocks. High-output pacing is recommended to ensure consistent capture, particularly in pacemaker-dependent patients who are likely to be defibrillated. Whether biphasic waveform defibrillation compounds this problem is not known. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine serial changes in ventricular pacing thresholds following single, multiple, low- and high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks from an implanted defibrillator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Bipolar pacing thresholds before and after defibrillation, and the adequacy of pacing capture at three times preshock threshold in the immediate aftermath of ventricular defibrillation, were prospectively evaluated in 67 consecutively tested recipients of a biphasic implanted cardioverter defibrillator. Overall, serial pacing thresholds following successful defibrillation were completely unchanged after 141 of 177 (80%) ventricular fibrillation inductions. In no case did the threshold pulse width increment > 0.06 msec from its baseline value after shock, nor did pacing at a pulse width of three times preshock threshold from dedicated bipolar pacing electrodes fail to result in successful ventricular capture. Changes in threshold were not related to when measured from the time of shock, defibrillation energy, number of shocks, electrode system, chronicity of leads, shock orientation, or to clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically important changes in pacing threshold were observed after biphasic waveform defibrillation. Bradycardia pacing at conventional pacemaker outputs of three times baseline pulse width threshold from bipolar electrodes dedicated exclusively to pacing or sensing (but not defibrillation) consistently allowed for an adequate safety margin following defibrillation.

摘要

引言

单相波心室除颤电击后,心室起搏阈值显著升高。建议采用高输出起搏以确保持续夺获,尤其是对于可能接受除颤的起搏器依赖患者。双相波除颤是否会使这个问题更加严重尚不清楚。这项前瞻性研究的目的是检查植入式除颤器进行单次、多次、低能量和高能量双相除颤电击后心室起搏阈值的系列变化。

方法与结果

前瞻性评估了67例连续接受双相植入式心脏复律除颤器测试的患者除颤前后的双极起搏阈值,以及心室除颤后立即以电击前阈值的三倍进行起搏夺获的充分性。总体而言,在177次心室颤动诱发中的141次(80%)成功除颤后,连续起搏阈值完全没有变化。在任何情况下,电击后阈值脉冲宽度从基线值增加均未超过0.06毫秒,专用双极起搏电极以电击前阈值三倍的脉冲宽度进行起搏也均能成功夺获心室。阈值变化与电击时间、除颤能量、电击次数、电极系统、导线存留时间、电击方向或临床因素均无关。

结论

双相波除颤后未观察到起搏阈值出现具有临床意义的变化。对于专门用于起搏或感知(而非除颤)的双极电极,以基线脉冲宽度阈值三倍的传统起搏器输出进行心动过缓起搏,在除颤后始终能提供足够的安全裕度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验