Cooley D A, Wukasch D C, Leachman R D
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1976 Sep-Oct;17(5):380-7.
Treatment of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis (IHSS) remains a controversial problem and depending upon many factors, medical or surgical treatment may be elected. When medical therapy fails and surgery is recommended, choice of an appropriate surgical technique may be difficult. An analysis is given of 27 patients who have undergone only mitral valve replacement as definitive treatment. Twenty-six patients were dismissed from the hospital with good or excellent results and one died (3.7 percent mortality). Pressure gradients across the left ventricular outflow tract after operation were eliminated in every instance. The mean preoperative gradient was 74 mm Hg and postoperatively was 6.9 mm Hg. Advantages and disadvantages of mitral valve replacement as definitive treatment of IHSS are presented. This method of treatment should be reserved for patients with incapacitating symptoms, congestive heart failure, severe left ventricular hypertension, unusual electrocardiographic findings or in patients who have failed to respond favorably to previous septectomy.
特发性肥厚性主动脉瓣下狭窄(IHSS)的治疗仍然是一个有争议的问题,根据多种因素,可选择药物治疗或手术治疗。当药物治疗失败且建议进行手术时,选择合适的手术技术可能会很困难。本文分析了27例仅接受二尖瓣置换术作为最终治疗的患者。26例患者出院时效果良好或极佳,1例死亡(死亡率为3.7%)。术后左心室流出道的压力阶差在每种情况下均消除。术前平均压力阶差为74 mmHg,术后为6.9 mmHg。本文介绍了二尖瓣置换术作为IHSS最终治疗方法的优缺点。这种治疗方法应保留给有失能症状、充血性心力衰竭、严重左心室高血压、异常心电图表现的患者,或对先前的室间隔切除术反应不佳的患者。