Uhlenhuth E H, Balter M B, Ban T A, Yang K
Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque 87131, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Dec;18(6 Suppl 2):27S-31S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199812001-00006.
The objective of this study was to assemble expert clinical experience and judgment regarding the treatment of panic disorder in a systematic, quantitative manner, particularly with respect to changes during the past 5 years. A panel of 73 internationally recognized experts in the field of pharmacotherapy of anxiety and depression was constituted by multistage peer nomination. Sixty-six experts completed a questionnaire in 1992, and 51 of those completed a follow-up questionnaire in 1997. This report focuses on the experts' responses to questions about therapeutic options as they relate to a vignette describing a typical case of panic disorder. The preferred initial treatment strategy in 1992 (59%) and in 1997 (55%) was a combination of medication with cognitive behavioral therapy. The vast majority of the expert panel included a medication in their recommendations--91% in 1992 and 90% in 1997. Experts recommending a medication for panic in 1992 chose as first-line treatment a benzodiazepine (35%), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI, 7%), an older antidepressant (33%), or a combination of medications (25%), principally a benzodiazepine plus an older antidepressant (19%). In 1997, fewer chose a benzodiazepine (15%) or an older antidepressant (11%) alone, whereas 33% chose an SSRI alone. More experts chose a combination of medications in 1997 (39%), and the increase was attributable mainly to the choice of a benzodiazepine plus an SSRI (17%). Overall, there was only a small decline in recommendations for benzodiazepines, whereas the increased choice of SSRIs came largely at the expense of the older antidepressants. As second-line medications for panic should their first-line choice fail, the experts in 1997 recommended a benzodiazepine (7%), an SSRI (15%), an older antidepressant (28%), or a combination of medications (50%), most often a benzodiazepine plus an older antidepressant (21%) or a benzodiazepine plus an SSRI (17%). (Experts were not asked to recommend second-line treatment in 1992). Thus, in case of unsatisfactory response, the experts' choices shifted from benzodiazepines and SSRIs alone toward the older antidepressants alone or combinations of an antidepressant plus a benzodiazepine. This report concluded that combined cognitive behavioral therapy plus medication was highly favored by the experts as the initial treatment strategy for panic disorder. Over the past 5 years, SSRIs displaced older antidepressants as the experts' choice for first-line pharmacotherapy of panic disorder. In case of an unsatisfactory response, the experts more often recommended an older antidepressant or a combination of an antidepressant plus a benzodiazepine. According to the experts' judgments, the benzodiazepines, especially combined with an antidepressant, remain mainstays of pharmacotherapy for panic disorder.
本研究的目的是以系统、定量的方式收集有关惊恐障碍治疗的专家临床经验和判断,特别是关于过去5年中的变化。通过多阶段同行提名组成了一个由73名国际公认的焦虑和抑郁药物治疗领域专家组成的小组。66名专家在1992年完成了一份问卷,其中51名在1997年完成了一份随访问卷。本报告重点关注专家们对与一个描述惊恐障碍典型病例的 vignette 相关的治疗选择问题的回答。1992年(59%)和1997年(55%)首选的初始治疗策略是药物治疗与认知行为疗法相结合。绝大多数专家小组在其建议中纳入了药物治疗——1992年为91%,1997年为90%。1992年推荐用于惊恐障碍药物治疗的专家将苯二氮䓬类药物(35%)、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI,7%)、一种较老的抗抑郁药(33%)或药物组合(25%)作为一线治疗选择,主要是苯二氮䓬类药物加一种较老的抗抑郁药(19%)。1997年,单独选择苯二氮䓬类药物(15%)或较老的抗抑郁药(11%)的专家较少,而33%的专家单独选择了SSRI。1997年更多专家选择了药物组合(39%),这种增加主要归因于苯二氮䓬类药物加SSRI的选择(17%)。总体而言,对苯二氮䓬类药物的推荐仅有小幅下降,而SSRI选择的增加在很大程度上是以较老的抗抑郁药为代价的。作为惊恐障碍一线治疗失败后的二线药物,1997年专家们推荐了苯二氮䓬类药物(7%)、SSRI(15%)、一种较老的抗抑郁药(28%)或药物组合(50%),最常见的是苯二氮䓬类药物加一种较老的抗抑郁药(21%)或苯二氮䓬类药物加SSRI(17%)。(1992年未要求专家推荐二线治疗)。因此,在反应不满意的情况下,专家们的选择从单独使用苯二氮䓬类药物和SSRI转向单独使用较老的抗抑郁药或抗抑郁药加苯二氮䓬类药物的组合。本报告得出结论,认知行为疗法加药物治疗相结合作为惊恐障碍的初始治疗策略受到专家们的高度青睐。在过去5年中,SSRI取代了较老的抗抑郁药,成为专家们对惊恐障碍一线药物治疗的选择。在反应不满意的情况下,专家们更常推荐较老的抗抑郁药或抗抑郁药加苯二氮䓬类药物的组合。根据专家们的判断,苯二氮䓬类药物,特别是与抗抑郁药联合使用时,仍然是惊恐障碍药物治疗的主要支柱。