• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)与诺丁汉患者依赖度系统等同吗?这些系统能用于确定护理工作量和技能组合吗?

Does the APACHE II scoring system equate with the Nottingham Patient Dependency System? Can these systems be used to determine nursing workload and skill mix?

作者信息

Viney C, Poxon I, Jordan C, Winter B

机构信息

Nottingham University School of Nursing.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 1997 Mar-Apr;2(2):59, 62-3.

PMID:9873303
Abstract

The development of a holistic patient dependency system for intensive care in Nottingham has enabled nursing staff to analyse their patient's needs more comprehensively and relate them to existing staffing levels. A recent publication (Chellel et al., 1995) implied that some units were using medical scoring systems to predict workload and that practitioners were dissatisfied with current scoring systems. Patient dependency scores were correlated with APACHE II scores by regression analysis on 1,743 patients from the Adult Intensive. Care Unit at the University Hospital, Nottingham. Analysis revealed that APACHE II had little ability to predict patient dependency and, therefore, is unreliable at predicting nursing workload and skill mix.

摘要

诺丁汉重症监护整体患者依赖系统的开发,使护理人员能够更全面地分析患者需求,并将其与现有人员配备水平联系起来。最近的一份出版物(Chellel等人,1995年)表明,一些科室正在使用医疗评分系统来预测工作量,且从业者对当前的评分系统不满意。通过对诺丁汉大学医院成人重症监护病房1743例患者进行回归分析,得出患者依赖评分与急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分相关。分析显示,APACHE II几乎没有能力预测患者的依赖性,因此,在预测护理工作量和技能组合方面并不可靠。

相似文献

1
Does the APACHE II scoring system equate with the Nottingham Patient Dependency System? Can these systems be used to determine nursing workload and skill mix?急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)与诺丁汉患者依赖度系统等同吗?这些系统能用于确定护理工作量和技能组合吗?
Nurs Crit Care. 1997 Mar-Apr;2(2):59, 62-3.
2
Patient requirements for nursing care: the development of an instrument.患者护理需求:一种工具的开发
Can J Nurs Adm. 1998 Jan-Feb;11(1):31-51.
3
Matching nurse skill with patient acuity in the intensive care units: a risk management mandate.重症监护病房中护士技能与患者病情严重程度的匹配:一项风险管理要求。
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Jul;14(5):397-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00622.x.
4
Patient severity as an indicator of nursing workload in the intensive care unit.患者严重程度作为重症监护病房护理工作量的一个指标。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Jan-Feb;12(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2006.00193.x.
5
Measuring nursing workload in neonatal intensive care.测量新生儿重症监护中的护理工作量。
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Apr;14(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00609.x.
6
Multicentre study of validity and interrater reliability of the modified Nursing Care Recording System (NCR11) for assessment of workload in the ICU.改良护理记录系统(NCR11)用于评估重症监护病房工作量的有效性及评分者间信度的多中心研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Jul;48(6):690-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00397.x.
7
A review of nursing skill-mix to optimise care in an acute trust.对护理技能组合进行回顾以优化急性信托机构中的护理服务。
Nurs Times. 2004;100(6):34-8.
8
Nursing workload associated with fever in the general intensive care unit.综合重症监护病房中与发热相关的护理工作量。
Am J Crit Care. 2008 Nov;17(6):522-31.
9
Comparison of costing tools in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中成本核算工具的比较
Paediatr Nurs. 1999 Nov;11(9):14-6.
10
An evaluation of an acuity system as it applies to a cardiac catheterization laboratory.对一种应用于心脏导管实验室的 acuity 系统的评估。
Comput Nurs. 1999 May-Jun;17(3):129-34.