Charteris W P, Kelly P M, Morelli L, Collins J K
SET Consultants Ltd., Douglas, Cork, Ireland.
J Food Prot. 1998 Dec;61(12):1636-43. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.12.1636.
In recent years, the time-honored reputation of lactobacilli as promoters of gastrointestinal and female urogenital health has been qualified. This has occurred due to a rare association with human infection in the presence of certain predisposing factors and their potential to act as a source of undesirable antibiotic resistance determinants to other members of the indigenous microbiota. This necessitates greater caution in their selection for use in microbial adjunct nutrition and disease management (prophylaxis and therapy). It was against this background that 46 Lactobacillus strains from human and dairy sources were assayed for susceptibility to 44 antibiotics. All strains were resistant to a group of 14 antibiotics, which included inhibitors of cell wall synthesis (cefoxitin [30 microg] and aztreonam [30 microg]), protein synthesis (amikacin [30 microg], gentamicin [10 microg], kanamycin [30 microg], and streptomycin [10 microg]), nucleic acid synthesis (norfloxacin [10 microg], nalidixic acid [30 microg], sulphamethoxazole [100 microg], trimethoprim [5 microg], co-trimoxazole [25 microg], and metronidazole [5 microg]), and cytoplasmic membrane function (polymyxin B [300 microg] and colistin sulphate [10 microg]). All strains were susceptible to tetracycline (30 microg), chloramphenicol (30 microg), and rifampicin (5 microg). Four human strains and one dairy strain exhibited atypical resistance to a penicillin, bacitracin (10 microg), and/or nitrofurantoin (300 microg). One human strain was also resistant to erythromycin (15 microg) and clindamycin (2 microg). These resistances may have been acquired due to antibiotic exposure in vivo, but conclusive evidence is lacking in this regard. Seven microorganism-drug combinations were evaluated for beta-lactamase activity using synergy and nitrocefin tests. The absence of activity suggested that cell wall impermeability appeared responsible for beta-lactam resistance. The occurrence of a minority of lactobacilli with undesirable, atypical resistance to certain antibiotics demonstrates that not all strains are suitable for use as probiotics or bacteriotherapeutic agents. The natural resistance of lactobacilli to a wide range of clinically important antibiotics may enable the development of antibiotic/probiotic combination therapies for such conditions as diarrhea, female urogenital tract infection, and infective endocarditis.
近年来,乳酸杆菌作为促进胃肠道和女性泌尿生殖系统健康的传统声誉受到质疑。出现这种情况是因为在某些易感因素存在时,它与人类感染存在罕见关联,且有可能成为本土微生物群其他成员不良抗生素耐药决定因素的来源。这就需要在选择将其用于微生物辅助营养和疾病管理(预防和治疗)时更加谨慎。正是在这样的背景下,对来自人类和乳制品来源的46株乳酸杆菌菌株进行了44种抗生素的药敏试验。所有菌株对一组14种抗生素耐药,这些抗生素包括细胞壁合成抑制剂(头孢西丁[30微克]和氨曲南[30微克])、蛋白质合成抑制剂(阿米卡星[30微克]、庆大霉素[10微克]、卡那霉素[30微克]和链霉素[10微克])、核酸合成抑制剂(诺氟沙星[10微克]、萘啶酸[30微克]、磺胺甲恶唑[100微克]、甲氧苄啶[5微克]、复方新诺明[25微克]和甲硝唑[5微克])以及细胞质膜功能抑制剂(多粘菌素B[300微克]和硫酸黏菌素[10微克])。所有菌株对四环素(30微克)、氯霉素(30微克)和利福平(5微克)敏感。4株人类菌株和1株乳制品菌株对青霉素、杆菌肽(10微克)和/或呋喃妥因(300微克)表现出非典型耐药性。1株人类菌株还对红霉素(15微克)和克林霉素(2微克)耐药。这些耐药性可能是由于体内抗生素暴露而获得的,但在这方面缺乏确凿证据。使用协同试验和硝基头孢菌素试验评估了7种微生物 - 药物组合的β - 内酰胺酶活性。无活性表明细胞壁通透性可能是β - 内酰胺耐药的原因。少数乳酸杆菌对某些抗生素具有不良的非典型耐药性,这表明并非所有菌株都适合用作益生菌或细菌治疗剂。乳酸杆菌对多种临床上重要的抗生素具有天然耐药性,这可能有助于开发针对腹泻、女性泌尿生殖道感染和感染性心内膜炎等病症的抗生素/益生菌联合疗法。