Dagum P, Pinto H A, Newman J P, Higgins J P, Terris D J, Goffinet D R, Fee W E
Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5407, USA.
Am J Surg. 1998 Nov;176(5):448-52. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00240-2.
To investigate clinicopathologic predictive criteria for the optimal management of neck metastases in patients with advanced head and neck cancers treated with combined chemoradiotherapy.
Prospective study, 48 patients. Mean length follow-up, 23 months.
Neck stage predicted neck response to chemoradiotherapy; N3 necks showed more partial responses (P = 0.04), and N1 necks showed more complete responses (P = 0.12). Primary tumor site strongly predicted the pathologic response found on neck dissection in patients with a clinical partial response (cPR) following chemoradiotherapy. There was no difference in survival between patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy, and patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neck dissection (P = 0.20); however, when grouped together, these patients survived longer than did patients with a pPR at neck dissection (P = 0.06).
Clinical response to induction chemotherapy is a poor predictor of ultimate neck control. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, and planned neck dissection for patients with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy, provides good regional control.
探讨晚期头颈部癌患者接受放化疗联合治疗时颈部转移瘤最佳管理的临床病理预测标准。
前瞻性研究,48例患者。平均随访时间23个月。
颈部分期可预测颈部对放化疗的反应;N3期颈部显示更多部分缓解(P = 0.04),N1期颈部显示更多完全缓解(P = 0.12)。在放化疗后出现临床部分缓解(cPR)的患者中,原发肿瘤部位强烈预测颈部清扫时发现的病理反应。放化疗后出现临床完全缓解(cCR)的患者与颈部清扫后出现病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者之间生存率无差异(P = 0.20);然而,将这些患者归为一组时,他们的生存期比颈部清扫时出现病理部分缓解(pPR)的患者更长(P = 0.06)。
诱导化疗的临床反应对最终颈部控制的预测性较差。诱导化疗后进行放化疗,并对持续性颈部淋巴结病患者进行计划性颈部清扫,可提供良好的区域控制。