Animal experimentation. India backs off on central control.
作者信息
Bagla P
出版信息
Science. 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):1967. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.1967a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Animal experimentation. India backs off on central control.动物实验。印度放弃中央管控。
Science. 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):1967. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.1967a.
2
Animal experimentation is immoral.
Br J Neurosurg. 1993;7(3):235-9. doi: 10.3109/02688699309023804.
3
Animal experimentation. Strict rules rile Indian scientists.动物实验。严格规定激怒印度科学家。
Science. 1998 Sep 18;281(5384):1777-8. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5384.1777a.
4
European researchers grapple with animal rights.欧洲研究人员应对动物权利问题。
Science. 1999 Jun 4;284(5420):1604-6. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5420.1604.
5
House backs year's delay in extra care for lab rats.豪斯支持将对实验鼠的额外照料推迟一年。
N Y Times Web. 2000 Oct 12:A16.
6
German vote. Animal rights amendment defeated.
Science. 2000 Apr 21;288(5465):411-3. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5465.411b.
7
U.S. law and animal experimentation: a critical primer.美国法律与动物实验：重要入门指南
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Nov-Dec;Suppl:S35-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.107.
8
The use of nonhuman animals in speech, language, and hearing research.
ASHA. 1993 Apr;35(4):57-65.
9
Court says lab rats deserve special care.法院称实验用大鼠应得到特殊照料。
N Y Times Web. 2000 Oct 7:A16.
10
Deficiencies in the National Institute of Health's guidelines for the care and protection of laboratory animals.
J Med Philos. 1993 Aug;18(4):375-88. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.4.375.
Zotero 插件