Suppr超能文献

上呼吸道感染治疗的系统评价

Systematic review of the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection.

作者信息

Fahey T, Stocks N, Thomas T

机构信息

Division of Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1998 Sep;79(3):225-30. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.3.225.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment in children with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI).

DESIGN

Quantitative systematic review of randomised trials that compare antibiotic treatment with placebo.

DATA SOURCES

Twelve trials retrieved from a systematic search (electronic databases, contact with authors, contact with drug manufacturers, reference lists); no restriction on language.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of children in whom the clinical outcome was worse or unchanged; the proportion of children who suffered complications or progression of illness; the proportion of children who had side effects.

RESULTS

1699 children were randomised in six trials that contributed to the meta-analysis. Six trials were not used in the meta-analysis because of different outcomes or incomplete data. Clinical outcome was not improved by antibiotic treatment (relative risk 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 1.13), neither was the proportion of children suffering from complications or progression of illness (relative risk 0.71, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.12). Complications from URTI in the five trials that reported this outcome was low (range 2-15%). Antibiotic treatment was not associated with an increase in side effects compared with placebo (relative risk 0.8, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the lack of efficacy and low complication rates, antibiotic treatment of children with URTI is not supported by current evidence from randomised trials.

摘要

目的

评估抗生素治疗对上呼吸道感染(URTI)症状儿童的风险和益处。

设计

对比较抗生素治疗与安慰剂的随机试验进行定量系统评价。

数据来源

通过系统检索(电子数据库、联系作者、联系药品制造商、参考文献列表)检索到12项试验;无语言限制。

主要结局指标

临床结局更差或未改变的儿童比例;发生并发症或疾病进展的儿童比例;出现副作用的儿童比例。

结果

六项试验中1699名儿童被随机分组,这些试验纳入了荟萃分析。六项试验因结局不同或数据不完整未纳入荟萃分析。抗生素治疗未改善临床结局(相对危险度1.01,95%置信区间(CI)0.90至1.13),发生并发症或疾病进展的儿童比例也未改善(相对危险度0.71,95%CI 0.45至1.12)。报告该结局的五项试验中URTI并发症发生率较低(范围2%-15%)。与安慰剂相比,抗生素治疗未增加副作用(相对危险度0.8,95%CI 0.54至1.21)。

结论

鉴于缺乏疗效且并发症发生率低,目前随机试验的证据不支持用抗生素治疗URTI儿童。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection.
Arch Dis Child. 1998 Sep;79(3):225-30. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.3.225.
2
Delayed antibiotics for symptoms and complications of respiratory infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub2.
4
Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections.
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jul;8(4):1297-371. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1927.
5
Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):57-109. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1893.
6
Influenza vaccines for preventing acute otitis media in infants and children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 24(3):CD010089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010089.pub2.
8
Efficacy of vitamin C for the prevention and treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. A meta-analysis in children.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;75(3):303-311. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2601-7. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

4
The Behavior of Primary Healthcare Doctors Toward Antibiotic Prescriptions for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 31;16(1):e53298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53298. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Paediatric Deep Neck Infection-The Risk of Needing Intensive Care.
Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;9(7):979. doi: 10.3390/children9070979.
7
Spread of Respiratory Pathogens During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Children in the Northeast of Italy.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 24;13:804700. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.804700. eCollection 2022.
8
The Disappearance of Respiratory Viruses in Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;18(18):9550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189550.
9
Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey for Kids: Validation of an Illness-specific Quality of Life Instrument.
Pediatr Res. 2021 Dec;90(6):1207-1214. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01395-9. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN ACUTE VIRAL RESPIRATORY DISEASES.
Am J Dis Child. 1965 Jun;109:544-53. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090020546009.
2
Prevention of complications of respiratory illnesses in pediatric practice. A double-blind study.
N Engl J Med. 1962 Apr 5;266:683-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196204052661401.
3
Chemoprophylaxis during respiratory infections in a private pediatric practice.
AMA J Dis Child. 1960 May;99:566-73. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1960.02070030568002.
4
Pediatric conference.
Arch Pediatr (N Y). 1960 Apr;77:171-87.
5
Control of respiratory infections in children by tetracycline.
Br Med J. 1961 Feb 18;1(5224):469-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5224.469.
7
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
8
Resistant organisms: a dilemma for primary care?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jul;47(420):415-6.
10
Antimicrobials for acute otitis media? A review from the International Primary Care Network.
BMJ. 1997 Jul 12;315(7100):98-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7100.98.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验