Dhainaut J F, Tenaillon A, Hemmer M, Damas P, Le Tulzo Y, Radermacher P, Schaller M D, Sollet J P, Wolff M, Holzapfel L, Zeni F, Vedrinne J M, de Vathaire F, Gourlay M L, Guinot P, Mira J P
Medical Intensive Care Unit of Cochin Port-Royal University Hospital, Paris, France.
Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;26(12):1963-71. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00021.
To determine the efficacy and safety of using natural platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist (PAFra), BN 52021, to treat patients with severe Gram-negative bacterial sepsis.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.
Fifty-nine academic medical center intensive care units in Europe.
Six hundred nine patients with severe sepsis, suspected to be related to Gram-negative bacterial infection, who received PAFra or placebo.
Patients were randomized to receive either a dose of PAFra (120 mg iv) every 12 hrs over a 4-day period or placebo over a 4-day period.
The patients were well matched at study entry for severity of illness and for risk factors known to influence the outcome of sepsis. Among all randomized patients, the 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 49% (152/308) in the placebo group, and 47% (140/300) in the PAFra group (p=.50). When analyzed on the basis of the previously defined target population, the 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 50% (115/232) in the placebo group and 44% (94/212) in the PAFra group, yielding a 12% reduction in mortality rate (p=.29). In patients with documented infection involving other organisms, there was no difference between treated and placebo groups. When the outcomes of organ dysfunctions were examined in the overall population and in the documented Gram-negative bacterial infection population, the number of patients who resolved hepatic dysfunction tended to be higher in the treated group than in the placebo group (p=.06). The number of adverse events reported were not different between the two groups.
A 4-day administration of the studied PAFra (BN 52021) failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the mortality rate of patients with severe sepsis suspected to be related to Gram-negative bacterial infection. If PAFra treatment has any therapeutic activity in severe Gram-negative bacterial sepsis, the incremental benefits are small and will be difficult to demonstrate in a patient population as defined by this clinical trial.
确定使用天然血小板活化因子受体拮抗剂(PAFra)BN 52021治疗重症革兰氏阴性菌败血症患者的疗效和安全性。
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。
欧洲59个学术医学中心重症监护病房。
609例疑似与革兰氏阴性菌感染相关的重症败血症患者,接受了PAFra或安慰剂治疗。
患者被随机分为在4天内每12小时接受一剂PAFra(静脉注射120毫克)或在4天内接受安慰剂治疗。
患者在研究入组时病情严重程度及已知影响败血症预后的危险因素方面匹配良好。在所有随机分组的患者中,安慰剂组28天全因死亡率为49%(152/308),PAFra组为47%(140/300)(p = 0.50)。根据先前定义的目标人群进行分析时,安慰剂组28天全因死亡率为50%(115/232),PAFra组为44%(94/212),死亡率降低了12%(p = 0.29)。在有记录的涉及其他病原体感染的患者中,治疗组和安慰剂组之间没有差异。当在总体人群和有记录的革兰氏阴性菌感染人群中检查器官功能障碍的结果时,治疗组中肝功能障碍得到缓解的患者数量往往高于安慰剂组(p = 0.06)。两组报告的不良事件数量没有差异。
对所研究的PAFra(BN 52021)进行4天给药未能显示出在疑似与革兰氏阴性菌感染相关的重症败血症患者死亡率方面有统计学意义的降低。如果PAFra治疗在重症革兰氏阴性菌败血症中有任何治疗活性,其增加的益处很小,并且在本临床试验所定义的患者人群中难以证明。