• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿莫西林/克拉维酸与头孢克洛治疗儿童急性中耳炎的随机、观察者盲法试验。奥格门汀415研究组。

A randomized, observer-blind trial of amoxycillin/clavulanate versus cefaclor in the treatment of children with acute otitis media. Augmentin 415 Study Group.

作者信息

Subba Rao S D, Macias M P, Dillman C A, Ramos B D, Kierszenbaum J S, Soliman A E

机构信息

St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1998 Dec;10(6):460-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.460.

DOI:10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.460
PMID:9876054
Abstract

In this randomized, multicenter, observer-blind study, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefaclor were compared in children with a clinical diagnosis of acute otitis media. Patients aged between 1 and 12 years received either amoxycillin/clavulanate (250 mg/62 mg t.i.d., or 125 mg/31 mg t.i.d. if aged under 6 years) or cefaclor (250 mg t.i.d., or 125 mg t.i.d. if aged under 6 years) for 7 days. The amoxycillin/clavulanate regimen was based on a dose of 20/5 mg/kg/day (representing 20 mg amoxycillin plus 5 mg clavulanic acid) in three divided doses. Patients were followed-up at the end of therapy and on days 10-12 and 38-40. At the end of the study (days 38-40), clinical success rates were 91.4% for amoxycillin/clavulanate and 78.6% for cefaclor. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.008). After the 7 days of treatment, 3 patients (2.9%) in the amoxycillin/clavulanate group had clinical failure, compared with 18 patients (16.1%) in the cefaclor group (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in adverse event profiles. The incidence of diarrhea was low (7.0% amoxycillin/clavulanate, 8.4% cefaclor) and was generally of mild or moderate intensity. The study demonstrated that amoxycillin/clavulanate was significantly more effective clinically than cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

摘要

在这项随机、多中心、观察者盲法研究中,对阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢克洛在临床诊断为急性中耳炎的儿童中的疗效、安全性和耐受性进行了比较。1至12岁的患者接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸(250mg/62mg,每日三次;6岁以下患者为125mg/31mg,每日三次)或头孢克洛(250mg,每日三次;6岁以下患者为125mg,每日三次)治疗7天。阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗方案的剂量为20/5mg/kg/天(相当于20mg阿莫西林加5mg克拉维酸),分三次给药。在治疗结束时以及第10 - 12天和第38 - 40天对患者进行随访。在研究结束时(第38 - 40天),阿莫西林/克拉维酸的临床成功率为91.4%,头孢克洛为78.6%。差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.008)。治疗7天后,阿莫西林/克拉维酸组有3例患者(2.9%)临床治疗失败,而头孢克洛组有18例患者(16.1%)临床治疗失败(p < 0.001)。两种治疗耐受性均良好,两组不良事件谱无统计学显著差异。腹泻发生率较低(阿莫西林/克拉维酸组为7.0%,头孢克洛组为8.4%),且一般为轻度或中度。该研究表明,在治疗儿童急性中耳炎方面,阿莫西林/克拉维酸在临床上比头孢克洛显著更有效。

相似文献

1
A randomized, observer-blind trial of amoxycillin/clavulanate versus cefaclor in the treatment of children with acute otitis media. Augmentin 415 Study Group.阿莫西林/克拉维酸与头孢克洛治疗儿童急性中耳炎的随机、观察者盲法试验。奥格门汀415研究组。
J Chemother. 1998 Dec;10(6):460-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.460.
2
Efficacy and safety of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmentin) twice daily versus three times daily in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. The Augmentin 454 Study Group.
J Chemother. 2000 Feb;12(1):79-87. doi: 10.1179/joc.2000.12.1.79.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
4
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
5
Comparative treatment trial of augmentin versus cefaclor for acute otitis media with effusion.阿莫西林克拉维酸钾与头孢克洛治疗急性分泌性中耳炎的对比治疗试验。
Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):819-26.
6
Cefprozil versus high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate in children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯与高剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 2001 Feb;23(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80002-3.
7
A comparative study of cefaclor vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in tonsillopharyngitis.头孢克洛与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗扁桃体咽炎的对比研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):1016-22.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.头孢丙烯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Jun;33(6):1209-18. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.6.1209.
9
Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Spektramox) and cefaclor (Kefolor) in children with recurrent AOM or therapy failure.
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1988;449:43-4. doi: 10.3109/00016488809106370.
10
Clinical efficacy of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid and cefaclor in acute otitis media.
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1988;449:45-6. doi: 10.3109/00016488809106371.

引用本文的文献

1
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a review of its use in the management of paediatric patients with acute otitis media.阿莫西林/克拉维酸:用于治疗小儿急性中耳炎的综述
Drugs. 2003;63(3):311-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363030-00005.