• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢丙烯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性比较

Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

作者信息

Gehanno P, Berche P, Boucot I, Lambert-Zechovsky N, Bingen E, Gres J J, Rollin C

机构信息

Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, O.R.L. et Chirurgie Faciale, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Jun;33(6):1209-18. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.6.1209.

DOI:10.1093/jac/33.6.1209
PMID:7928814
Abstract

Cefprozil is a new oral cephalosporin with activity against the most common pathogens isolated in acute otitis media. This randomized study enrolled 361 patients (mean age 29 months). Physical examination and culture via tympanocentesis were required less than 48 h before therapy. One hundred and ninety-one patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy; 99 received cefprozil (20 mg/kg/day bd) and 92 received amoxycillin/clavulanate (13.3 mg/kg/day tid). Duration of treatment was 7-9 days for 81 patients, 10 days for 105 patients and 11-16 days for five patients. The treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographics, severity of infection and number of previous episodes. Clinical evaluations of efficacy were based on physical examination including otoscopy within a 14 day period after therapy. Satisfactory clinical responses were achieved in 84% of cefprozil-treated patients and 87% of amoxycillin/clavulanate-treated patients. Pathogens most commonly isolated included Haemophilus influenzae (33%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (22%). All 361 patients were evaluable for safety. Adverse clinical events were reported in 13% (24) of cefprozil-treated patients and 20% (36) of amoxycillin/clavulanate-treated patients. Cefprozil, administered twice a day, is comparable to a regimen of amoxycillin/clavulanate three times a day in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

摘要

头孢丙烯是一种新型口服头孢菌素,对急性中耳炎中分离出的最常见病原体具有活性。这项随机研究纳入了361例患者(平均年龄29个月)。治疗前不到48小时需要进行体格检查并通过鼓膜穿刺术进行培养。191例患者可评估临床疗效;99例接受头孢丙烯(20mg/kg/天,bid),92例接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸(13.3mg/kg/天,tid)。81例患者的治疗疗程为7 - 9天,105例患者为10天,5例患者为11 - 16天。治疗组在人口统计学、感染严重程度和既往发作次数方面具有可比性。疗效的临床评估基于治疗后14天内包括耳镜检查在内的体格检查。接受头孢丙烯治疗的患者中有84%以及接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中有87%获得了满意的临床反应。最常分离出的病原体包括流感嗜血杆菌(33%)和肺炎链球菌(22%)。所有361例患者均可评估安全性。接受头孢丙烯治疗的患者中有13%(24例)以及接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中有20%(36例)报告了不良临床事件。每日给药两次的头孢丙烯在治疗儿童急性中耳炎方面与每日给药三次的阿莫西林/克拉维酸方案相当。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.头孢丙烯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Jun;33(6):1209-18. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.6.1209.
2
Comparative trial of cefprozil vs. amoxicillin clavulanate potassium in the treatment of children with acute otitis media with effusion.头孢丙烯与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾治疗儿童急性分泌性中耳炎的对比试验
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991 May;10(5):375-80. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199105000-00006.
3
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
4
Bacteriologic failure of amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute otitis media caused by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗由非分型流感嗜血杆菌引起的急性中耳炎时的细菌学失败
J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):799-806. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70415-9.
5
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute purulent bacterial bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性化脓性细菌性支气管炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):166-77.
6
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):214-29.
7
Amoxycillin/clavulanate versus amoxycillin in recurrent otitis media and therapeutic failure in children.阿莫西林/克拉维酸与阿莫西林治疗儿童复发性中耳炎及治疗失败的比较
Acta Otolaryngol. 1991;111(1):120-9. doi: 10.3109/00016489109137362.
8
Comparison of cefprozil with other antibiotic regimens in the treatment of children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯与其他抗生素治疗方案在儿童急性中耳炎治疗中的比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14 Suppl 2:S204-8; discussion S209-11. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_2.s204.
9
Recurrent and penicillin V-resistant otitis media. A treatment study with amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefaclor.复发性及耐青霉素V型中耳炎。阿莫西林/克拉维酸与头孢克洛的治疗研究。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1988 Sep-Oct;106(3-4):171-7. doi: 10.3109/00016488809106422.
10
Cefprozil versus high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate in children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯与高剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 2001 Feb;23(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80002-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefprozil: a review.头孢丙烯:综述
Indian J Pediatr. 2003 May;70(5):395-400. doi: 10.1007/BF02723613.
2
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a review of its use in the management of paediatric patients with acute otitis media.阿莫西林/克拉维酸:用于治疗小儿急性中耳炎的综述
Drugs. 2003;63(3):311-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363030-00005.
3
Antigenic heterogeneity and molecular analysis of CopB of Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis.卡他莫拉菌(布兰汉菌属)CopB的抗原异质性及分子分析
Infect Immun. 1997 Sep;65(9):3666-71. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.9.3666-3671.1997.
4
Branhamella catarrhalis: epidemiology, surface antigenic structure, and immune response.卡他布兰汉菌:流行病学、表面抗原结构及免疫反应
Microbiol Rev. 1996 Jun;60(2):267-79. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.267-279.1996.