• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济激励措施对医疗保健质量的影响。

The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care.

作者信息

Dudley R A, Miller R H, Korenbrot T Y, Luft H S

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco 94109, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):649-86, 511. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00109.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00109
PMID:9879306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751095/
Abstract

Purchasers of health care could offer financial incentives to plans or providers in order to increase quality. Unfortunately, the current health care market, in which quality is rarely measured and there is no risk adjustment, actively discourages both plans and providers from maximizing quality, resulting in a poor overall level of quality, both in fee-for-service arrangements and health maintenance organizations. Health plans and providers will not focus on quality until mechanisms to correct for risk differences among enrollees can be developed. Although such risk adjustment will be the most important stimulus for quality, it should also be linked to improvements in information systems and agreement on a minimum benefits package, quality reporting standards, and financial solvency requirements.

摘要

医疗保健购买者可以向保险公司或医疗服务提供者提供经济激励措施,以提高医疗质量。不幸的是,在当前的医疗保健市场中,质量很少得到衡量,也不存在风险调整机制,这实际上阻碍了保险公司和医疗服务提供者将质量最大化,导致无论是在按服务收费模式还是健康维护组织中,整体医疗质量水平都很低。在开发出能够校正参保人之间风险差异的机制之前,健康保险公司和医疗服务提供者不会专注于质量。尽管这种风险调整将是提高质量的最重要刺激因素,但它也应与信息系统的改进以及在最低福利套餐、质量报告标准和财务偿付能力要求方面达成的共识联系起来。

相似文献

1
The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care.经济激励措施对医疗保健质量的影响。
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):649-86, 511. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00109.
2
The measure of Medicare services.医疗保险服务的衡量标准。
Hosp Health Netw. 1995 Jun 20;69(12):26-8, 30, 32-4.
3
HMO performance: the debate goes on.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):303-4; author reply 304-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.303.
4
The impact of health insurance plan type on satisfaction with health care.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2001 Spring;26(2):33-46. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200104000-00004.
5
Aligning incentives using risk-sharing arrangements.利用风险分担安排调整激励措施。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Feb;51(2):50-2, 54-7.
6
Health care utilization by the elderly in HMOs: comparing risk and cost contracts.健康维护组织(HMO)中老年人的医疗保健利用情况:风险与成本合同的比较
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998;11(2-3):45-9. doi: 10.1108/09526869810206035.
7
Should we stop making a fuss over HMOs?
Med Econ. 2000 May 22;77(10):41, 45.
8
Paying for quality not quantity: a wisconsin health maintenance organization proposes an incentive model for reimbursement of chiropractic services.为质量而非数量付费:威斯康星州一家健康维护组织提出脊椎按摩疗法服务报销激励模式。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jul;35(6):472-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
9
Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?管理式医疗会带来更好还是更差的医疗质量?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):7-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.7.
10
Linking compensation to quality--Medicare payments to physicians.将薪酬与质量挂钩——医疗保险向医生的支付
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 1;353(9):870-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058194.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health technologies and innovation patterns in diabetes ecosystems.糖尿病生态系统中的数字健康技术与创新模式。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;11:20552076241311740. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311740. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study.比较选定国家初级保健中按绩效付费(P4P)计划:一项比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09841-6.
3
Alignment in the Hospital-Physician Relationship: A Qualitative Multiple Case Study of Medical Specialist Enterprises in the Netherlands.医院-医师关系的协调:荷兰医学专科企业的定性多案例研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6917. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6917. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
4
Population turnover and leakage in commercial ACOs.商业 ACO 中的人员流动和流失。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Apr 1;29(4):e104-e110. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89350.
5
Insights on the effectiveness of reward schemes from 10-year longitudinal case studies in 2 Italian regions.来自意大利两个地区的10年纵向案例研究对奖励计划有效性的见解。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):e474-e484. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2496. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
The impact of financial incentives on the implementation of asthma or diabetes self-management: A systematic review.经济激励措施对哮喘或糖尿病自我管理实施情况的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 6;12(11):e0187478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187478. eCollection 2017.
7
Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.英国供应商财务激励措施对医疗质量的影响:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e800-e815. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693149. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
Limitations of and Barriers to Using Performance Measurement: Purchasers' Perspectives.使用绩效评估的局限性与障碍:购买者的视角
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):49-57.
9
Patient-reported access to primary care in Ontario: effect of organizational characteristics.患者报告的安大略省初级医疗服务可及性:组织特征的影响
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Jan;60(1):e24-31.
10
Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.绩效薪酬计划设计中的关键问题。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Feb;14(1):117-31. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0347-6. Epub 2011 Sep 1.