• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于情感障碍家族风险高的受试者,病前心理测量特征随时间推移是稳定的。

The pre-morbid psychometric profile is stable over time in subjects at high familial risk for affective disorders.

作者信息

Lauer C J, von Zerssen D, Schreiber W, Modell S, Holsboer F, Krieg J C

机构信息

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 1998 Oct;51(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00155-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00155-4
PMID:9879802
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pre-morbid personality profile 'autonomic lability' (e.g. elevated neuroticism, frequent somatic complaints and increased interpersonal sensitivity) is suggested to be an antecedent of major depression. Recently, we reported that the psychometric profile of healthy first-degree relatives of patients with an affective disorder (so-called high-risk probands; HRPs) was characterized by the personality trait 'rigidity' in association with 'autonomic lability' and speculated that such a profile might be a potential candidate for a true vulnerability marker for affective disorders. Because one major prerequisite for any valid vulnerability marker is its stability over time, we re-examined our HRPs about four years after index assessment.

METHODS

Sixteen HRPs from the initial sample (n=54) participated in the follow-up investigation which, on average, took place 47 months after index assessment. All these HRPs had remained mentally healthy during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The psychometric profile was remarkably stable over the four-year period when considering the total group of the 16 HRPs. On an individual level, similar findings were obtained. Allowing a fluctuation within a narrowly defined 'band width', a constancy of the self-ratings was found in 75% of the HRPs, within a broader 'band width' this was the case in 88% of the HRPs.

LIMITATIONS

The power of the present observations appears to be somewhat limited due to the still small sample size of HRPs re-investigated and the fact that the control probands were not yet re-examined.

CONCLUSIONS

The present follow-up findings in 16 probands at high risk for an affective disorder indicate a sufficient stability of the psychometric profile over time, so that this requirement for a true vulnerability marker is fulfilled.

摘要

背景

病前人格特征“自主神经易激惹性”(如神经质升高、频繁的躯体不适和人际敏感性增加)被认为是重度抑郁症的一个先兆。最近,我们报告称,情感障碍患者健康的一级亲属(所谓的高危先证者;HRPs)的心理测量特征表现为与“自主神经易激惹性”相关的“僵化”人格特质,并推测这种特征可能是情感障碍真正易感性标志物的潜在候选者。由于任何有效易感性标志物的一个主要前提是其随时间的稳定性,我们在首次评估约四年后对我们的HRPs进行了重新检查。

方法

初始样本(n = 54)中的16名HRPs参与了随访调查,平均在首次评估后47个月进行。所有这些HRPs在随访期间均保持心理健康。

结果

考虑16名HRPs的总体时,心理测量特征在四年期间非常稳定。在个体层面上也获得了类似的结果。在一个狭窄定义的“带宽”内允许波动的情况下,75%的HRPs自我评分保持恒定,在更宽的“带宽”内,88%的HRPs是这种情况。

局限性

由于重新调查的HRPs样本量仍然较小,且对照先证者尚未重新检查,目前观察结果的效力似乎有所受限。

结论

本次对16名情感障碍高危先证者的随访结果表明,心理测量特征随时间具有足够的稳定性,因此满足了真正易感性标志物的这一要求。

相似文献

1
The pre-morbid psychometric profile is stable over time in subjects at high familial risk for affective disorders.对于情感障碍家族风险高的受试者,病前心理测量特征随时间推移是稳定的。
J Affect Disord. 1998 Oct;51(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00155-4.
2
Pre-morbid psychometric profile of subjects at high familial risk for affective disorder.
Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):355-62. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004400.
3
The Munich vulnerability study on affective disorders: premorbid psychometric profile of affected individuals.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 May;109(5):332-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00309.x.
4
The Munich vulnerability study on affective disorders: overview of the cross-sectional observations at index investigation.
J Psychiatr Res. 1998 Nov-Dec;32(6):393-401. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(98)00026-0.
5
[The Munich Vulnerability Study of Affective Disorders. Overview of the results at index study].
Nervenarzt. 1998 Jul;69(7):574-85. doi: 10.1007/s001150050314.
6
The Munich Vulnerability Study on Affective Disorders: stability of polysomnographic findings over time.
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Sep 1;52(5):430-7. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01398-7.
7
The Munich Vulnerability Study on Affective Disorders: risk factors for unipolarity versus bipolarity.慕尼黑情感障碍易感性研究:单相情感障碍与双相情感障碍的风险因素
J Affect Disord. 2003 Apr;74(2):173-84. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00010-1.
8
The Munich vulnerability study on affective disorders: premorbid polysomnographic profile of affected high-risk probands.慕尼黑情感障碍易感性研究:受影响的高危先证者病前多导睡眠图特征
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov 1;58(9):694-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
9
The Munich vulnerability study on affective disorders: premorbid neuroendocrine profile of affected high-risk probands.慕尼黑情感障碍易感性研究:患病高危先证者的病前神经内分泌特征
J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.04.009.
10
Personality patterns in subjects at risk for affective disorders.情感障碍高危人群的人格模式。
Psychopathology. 1995;28 Suppl 1:59-72. doi: 10.1159/000284959.

引用本文的文献

1
Anhedonia is associated with blunted reward sensitivity in first-degree relatives of patients with major depression.快感缺失与重度抑郁症患者一级亲属中迟钝的奖赏敏感性相关。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:640-648. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.050. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
2
Recruitment of the left hemispheric emotional attention neural network in risk for and protection from depression.招募左半球情感注意神经网络以预防和保护抑郁。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013 Mar;38(2):117-28. doi: 10.1503/jpn.110188.