• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所致癌化学物质分类的变化。(德国MAK和BAT值列表第三部分)

Changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area. (Section III of the German List of MAK and BAT values).

作者信息

Neumann H G, Thielmann H W, Filser J G, Gelbke H P, Greim H, Kappus H, Norpoth K H, Reuter U, Vamvakas S, Wardenbach P, Wichmann H E

机构信息

Institute for Toxicology and Pharmacology, University of Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998;124(12):661-9. doi: 10.1007/s004320050229.

DOI:10.1007/s004320050229
PMID:9879826
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12200292/
Abstract

Carcinogenic chemicals in the work area were previously classified into three categories in section III of the German List of MAK and BAT values (the list of values on maximum workplace concentrations and biological tolerance for occupational exposures). This classification was based on qualitative criteria and reflected essentially the weight of evidence available for judging the carcinogenic potential of the chemicals. In the new classification scheme the former sections IIIA1, IIIA2, and IIIB are retained as categories 1, 2, and 3, to correspond with European Union regulations. On the basis of our advancing knowledge of reaction mechanisms and the potency of carcinogens, these three categories are supplemented with two additional categories. The essential feature of substances classified in the new categories is that exposure to these chemicals does not contribute significantly to the risk of cancer to man, provided that an appropriate exposure limit (MAK value) is observed. Chemicals known to act typically by non-genotoxic mechanisms, and for which information is available that allows evaluation of the effects of low-dose exposures, are classified in category 4. Genotoxic chemicals for which low carcinogenic potency can be expected on the basis of dose/response relationships and toxicokinetics and for which risk at low doses can be assessed are classified in category 5. The basis for a better differentiation of carcinogens is discussed, the new categories are defined, and possible criteria for classification are described. Examples for category 4 (1,4-dioxane) and category 5 (styrene) are presented.

摘要

工作区域中的致癌化学物质先前在德国MAK和BAT值列表(职业接触的最大工作场所浓度和生物耐受值列表)的第三部分中分为三类。这种分类基于定性标准,基本上反映了用于判断化学物质致癌潜力的现有证据的权重。在新的分类方案中,先前的IIIA1、IIIA2和IIIB部分保留为第1、2和3类,以符合欧盟法规。基于我们对反应机制和致癌物效力的不断深入了解,这三类又增加了两类。新类别中分类物质的基本特征是,只要遵守适当的接触限值(MAK值),接触这些化学物质对人类患癌风险的贡献就不大。已知通常通过非遗传毒性机制起作用且有信息可用于评估低剂量接触影响的化学物质分类为第4类。基于剂量/反应关系和毒代动力学预期致癌效力低且可评估低剂量风险的遗传毒性化学物质分类为第5类。讨论了更好地区分致癌物的依据,定义了新类别,并描述了可能的分类标准。给出了第4类(1,4-二氧六环)和第5类(苯乙烯)的示例。

相似文献

1
Changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area. (Section III of the German List of MAK and BAT values).工作场所致癌化学物质分类的变化。(德国MAK和BAT值列表第三部分)
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998;124(12):661-9. doi: 10.1007/s004320050229.
2
Changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area. Section III of the German List of MAK and BAT Values.工作场所致癌化学物质分类的变化。德国MAK和BAT值列表第三部分。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Nov;71(8):566-74. doi: 10.1007/s004200050325.
3
Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area.工作场所致癌化学物质分类的拟议变更。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Dec;26(3):288-95. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1152.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of endogenous versus exogenous sources in the exposome of putative genotoxins and consequences for risk assessment.内源性与外源性来源在假定遗传毒物暴露组学中的作用及其对风险评估的影响。
Arch Toxicol. 2022 May;96(5):1297-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03242-0. Epub 2022 Mar 6.