Klima S
Chirurgische Klinik, Klinikum Bernburg.
Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123 Suppl 4:90-3.
In laparoscopic appendectomy several variants of technique have been proposed. In a randomized prospective trial we compared three common techniques: 1. application of two endoloops, 2. application of two endoloops and additional manual stump sinking 3. application of endo-cutter. The study included 150 patients, 50 each per technique. The application of two endoloops with additional manual stump sinking as well as the cutter technique were associated with a low risk for complications. In contrast, appendectomy by two endoloops without stump sinking was associated with a higher risk for local complications. The manual stump sinking requires a high level of manual experience, whereas the cutter technique can be learned rapidly by surgical residents. Therefore, we recommend the cutter technique as standard procedure, because it allows laparoscopic appendectomy to be performed with high reliability by experienced surgeons as well as by novice surgical residents.
在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,已经提出了几种技术变体。在一项随机前瞻性试验中,我们比较了三种常用技术:1. 应用两个内镜圈套器;2. 应用两个内镜圈套器并额外进行手动残端埋入;3. 应用内镜切割器。该研究纳入了150例患者,每种技术各50例。应用两个内镜圈套器并额外进行手动残端埋入以及切割器技术的并发症风险较低。相比之下,仅用两个内镜圈套器而不进行残端埋入的阑尾切除术局部并发症风险较高。手动残端埋入需要高水平的手动操作经验,而切割器技术外科住院医师能很快学会。因此,我们推荐将切割器技术作为标准术式,因为它能让经验丰富的外科医生以及新手外科住院医师都能以高可靠性实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术。