Relman A S
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Channing Laboratory, Boston, MA 02115-5804, USA.
Acad Med. 1998 Dec;73(12):1229-33. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199812000-00010.
The corporate transformation of medicine raises questions about the basic purposes and values of the profession and the physician's social role that have not been adequately considered in medical school and residency curricula. Medical schools and graduate programs need to make students and trainees more aware of the conflict between traditional professional values and the imperatives of the market, so they will be better prepared to defend these values in the new business climate. Otherwise, medical schools and teaching hospitals could simply become trade schools, turning out sophisticated technicians, future entrepreneurs, and managers. As a starting point for educational reform, the author suggests that students (1) learn the social and political history of the medical profession of the United States over the past 200 years; (2) be introduced to the economic dimensions of health care--where the money comes from and how it is spent; (3) learn the history of health maintenance organizations, and understand the different forms of managed care and how they work; (4) become familiar with the health care reforms proposed by the Clinton Administration in the early 1990s, and understand why they were defeated and what has happened to health care reform since then; (5) examine the conflict between the culture of business managers and that of practicing physicians, and consider the recent efforts to achieve "quality control" as a balance to the emphasis on price; (6) be challenged to think about the important ethical, legal, and professional issues raised by the industrialization of health care; and (7) consider the political and professional options that might preserve the most important principles of medical professionalism while still addressing the social objectives of cost control, community service, and universal access. The author concludes that to prevent medicine from becoming merely a technologic business, the medical profession will have to become more actively involved with other policymakers and representatives of the public in efforts to improve the health care system, while preserving professional and social values. To do this, physicians will need a better knowledge of the health care system and its problems than most of them possess. This is a challenge medical educators must now address.
医学的企业化转型引发了关于该职业的基本目的和价值观以及医生社会角色的问题,而医学院校和住院医师培训课程对此并未进行充分思考。医学院校和研究生项目需要让学生和受训人员更加意识到传统职业价值观与市场需求之间的冲突,以便他们能在新的商业环境中更好地捍卫这些价值观。否则,医学院校和教学医院可能会沦为职业学校,培养出技艺精湛的技术人员、未来的企业家和管理人员。作为教育改革的起点,作者建议学生:(1)了解美国医学职业在过去200年的社会和政治历史;(2)接触医疗保健的经济层面——资金来源及使用方式;(3)学习健康维护组织的历史,理解不同形式的管理式医疗及其运作方式;(4)熟悉20世纪90年代初克林顿政府提出的医疗保健改革,明白改革失败的原因以及此后医疗保健改革的进展;(5)审视企业管理人员文化与执业医生文化之间的冲突,并思考近期为实现“质量控制”所做的努力,以此平衡对价格的强调;(6)思考医疗保健产业化引发的重要伦理、法律和职业问题;(7)考虑在兼顾成本控制、社区服务和全民可及性等社会目标的同时,如何在政治和职业层面上保留医学职业精神最重要原则的选择。作者总结认为,为防止医学仅仅沦为一门技术商业,医学职业必须更积极地与其他政策制定者及公众代表合作,努力改善医疗保健系统,同时保留职业和社会价值观。要做到这一点,医生需要比大多数人更深入地了解医疗保健系统及其问题。这是医学教育工作者现在必须应对的一项挑战。