O'Hare E A, O'Donohue W
Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb 60115, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 1998 Dec;27(6):561-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1018769016832.
A new model of the etiology of sexual harassment, the four-factor model, is presented and compared with several models of sexual harassment including the biological model, the organizational model, the sociocultural model, and the sex role spillover model. A number of risk factors associated with sexually harassing behavior are examined within the framework of the four-factor model of sexual harassment. These include characteristics of the work environment (e.g., sexist attitudes among co-workers, unprofessional work environment, skewed sex ratios in the workplace, knowledge of grievance procedures for sexual harassment incidents) as well as personal characteristics of the subject (e.g., physical attractiveness, job status, sex-role). Subjects were 266 university female faculty, staff, and students who completed the Sexual Experience Questionnaire to assess the experience of sexual harassment and a questionnaire designed to assess the risk factors stated above. Results indicated that the four-factor model is a better predictor of sexual harassment than the alternative models. The risk factors most strongly associated with sexual harassment were an unprofessional environment in the workplace, sexist atmosphere, and lack of knowledge about the organization's formal grievance procedures.
本文提出了一种性骚扰病因的新模型——四因素模型,并将其与几种性骚扰模型进行了比较,这些模型包括生物模型、组织模型、社会文化模型和性别角色溢出模型。在性骚扰四因素模型的框架内,研究了一些与性骚扰行为相关的风险因素。这些因素包括工作环境的特征(例如,同事间的性别歧视态度、不专业的工作环境、工作场所中失衡的性别比例、对性骚扰事件申诉程序的了解)以及受调查对象的个人特征(例如,外貌吸引力、工作地位、性别角色)。研究对象为266名大学女教师、工作人员和学生,她们完成了《性经历问卷》以评估性骚扰经历,并完成了一份旨在评估上述风险因素的问卷。结果表明,四因素模型比其他模型能更好地预测性骚扰。与性骚扰最密切相关的风险因素是工作场所不专业的环境、性别歧视氛围以及对组织正式申诉程序缺乏了解。