• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校（RAND/UCLA）颈动脉内膜切除术适宜性方法标准的预测效度。

Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Shekelle P G, Chassin M R, Park R E

机构信息

West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):707-27. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012022.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300012022
PMID:9885461
Abstract

We assessed the predictive validity of an expert panel's ratings of the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy by comparing ratings to the results of subsequent randomized clinical trials. We found the trials confirmed the ratings for 44 indications (covering almost 30% of operations performed in 1981) and refuted the ratings for none.

摘要

我们通过将专家小组对颈动脉内膜切除术适宜性的评级与后续随机临床试验的结果进行比较，评估了该评级的预测效度。我们发现这些试验证实了44种适应症的评级（涵盖了1981年进行的手术的近30%），且无一反驳这些评级。

相似文献

1
Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy.评估兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校（RAND/UCLA）颈动脉内膜切除术适宜性方法标准的预测效度。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):707-27. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012022.
2
Improving the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy: results of three city-wide studies.提高颈动脉内膜切除术的合理性：三项全市范围研究的结果
Axone. 2000 Mar;21(3):51-3.
3
Revisiting the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.重新审视颈动脉内膜切除术的合理性。
Stroke. 2003 Jun;34(6):1464-71. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000072514.79745.7D. Epub 2003 May 8.
4
Sydenham Society: assessing the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.西德纳姆学会：评估颈动脉内膜切除术的适宜性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;60(2):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
5
An audit tool for assessing the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.一种用于评估颈动脉内膜切除术适宜性的审计工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Jul 6;4(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-17.
6
Influence of projected complication rates on estimated appropriate use rates for carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness Project Investigators. Academic Medical Center Consortium.预计并发症发生率对颈动脉内膜切除术估计适宜使用率的影响。适宜性项目研究人员。学术医疗中心联盟。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):325-42.
7
Sydenham Society: racial variations in carotid endarterectomy.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;60(2):208-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
8
Assigning appropriateness ratings for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using two different approaches.使用两种不同方法对诊断性上消化道内镜检查进行适宜性评级。
Med Care. 1992 Nov;30(11):1016-28. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199211000-00005.
9
The appropriateness method has acceptable reliability and validity for assessing overuse and underuse of surgical procedures.该方法评估手术过度和不足使用的适宜性具有可接受的可靠性和有效性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.002.
10
Do the facts and figures warrant a 10-fold increase in the performance of carotid endarterectomy on asymptomatic patients?这些事实和数据是否足以证明对无症状患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术的效果提高了10倍？
Neurology. 1996 Mar;46(3):603-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.3.603.

引用本文的文献

1
National Agenda for Disparities Research in Hand Surgery: Validation of Social Determinant of Health Domains and Measurement Constructs.手外科差异研究国家议程：健康领域社会决定因素及测量结构的验证
Hand (N Y). 2025 May 1:15589447251336401. doi: 10.1177/15589447251336401.
2
Surgical appropriateness nudges: Developing behavioral science nudges to integrate appropriateness criteria into the decision making of spine surgeons.手术适宜性提示：开发行为科学提示，将适宜性标准纳入脊柱外科医生的决策过程中。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 19;19(4):e0300475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300475. eCollection 2024.
3
Geriatric Emergency Medication Safety Recommendations (GEMS-Rx): Modified Delphi Development of a High-Risk Prescription List for Older Emergency Department Patients.
老年急诊用药安全推荐（GEMS-Rx）：为老年急诊科患者制定高风险处方清单的改良 Delphi 法开发。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):274-284. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.033. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
Development of Diagnostic Quality Metrics for Prosthetic Joint Infection.人工关节感染诊断质量指标的制定。
J Healthc Qual. 2024;46(1):31-39. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000405. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
The Development and Validation of Data Elements and Process Steps for an Electronic Health Record for Hand Surgery Outreach Trips.手部外科外展之旅电子健康记录的数据元素和流程步骤的开发与验证
J Hand Microsurg. 2022 Jul 5;15(5):358-364. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749465. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Priorities for Advancing Mental and Social Health Among People Presenting for Care of Musculoskeletal Symptoms : International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care.有肌肉骨骼症状就诊人群的精神和社会健康促进优先事项：肌肉骨骼保健中的精神与社会健康国际联合会。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Mar;30(1):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09865-w. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
Prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: results of a Canadian RAND/UCLA appropriateness expert panel.胰腺切除术后预防胰瘘：加拿大 RAND/UCLA 适宜性专家小组的结果。
Can J Surg. 2022 Mar 2;65(2):E135-E142. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001520. Print 2022 Mar-Apr.
8
National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force Guidance for Management of Psoriatic Disease During the Pandemic: Version 1.国家银屑病基金会 COVID-19 工作组关于大流行期间银屑病管理的指南：第 1 版。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):1704-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Cardiorespiratory and Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in Hospitalized Children: A Delphi Process.住院儿童的心肺和脉搏血氧饱和度监测：德尔菲法
Pediatrics. 2020 Aug;146(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3336. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Clinical Scenarios for Which Cervical Mobilization and Manipulation Are Considered by an Expert Panel to Be Appropriate (and Inappropriate) for Patients With Chronic Neck Pain.专家小组认为适合（不适合）慢性颈痛患者的颈椎推拿和手法治疗的临床情况。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Apr;36(4):273-280. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000800.