Suppr超能文献

血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像与近红外分光光度法。最佳技术会脱颖而出吗?

BOLD MRI vs. NIR spectrophotometry. Will the best technique come forward?

作者信息

Dunn J F, Zaim-Wadghiri Y, Pogue B W, Kida I

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;454:103-13.

PMID:9889882
Abstract

This paper will discuss the assumptions, strengths and weaknesses of both BOLD imaging and NIR spectrophotometry with respect to monitoring tissue oxygenation. BOLD, or blood oxygen level dependent MRI, is an imaging protocol that is sensitive to specific relaxation rates which are influenced by deoxyhemoglobin. NIRS is capable of providing information on oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin. Both techniques have inherent assumptions, strengths and weaknesses. NIRS has not been able to provide the spatial sensitivity of BOLD. BOLD may be more difficult to quantify. Currently, these two methods are complementary, providing data that strengthens the interpretation of results from each modality. Recent data indicate that relaxation rates can be used to quantify deoxyhemoglobin in isolated blood and, under specific conditions, there is a strong correlation between deoxyhemoglobin content measured by NIRS and changes in relaxation rates measured by MRI. These data indicate that BOLD imaging has the potential to become an attractive alternative to NIRS.

摘要

本文将讨论血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像(BOLD)和近红外分光光度法在监测组织氧合方面的假设、优点和缺点。BOLD,即血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像,是一种对特定弛豫率敏感的成像方案,而这些弛豫率会受到脱氧血红蛋白的影响。近红外光谱法能够提供有关氧合血红蛋白、脱氧血红蛋白和总血红蛋白的信息。这两种技术都有其固有的假设、优点和缺点。近红外光谱法无法提供与BOLD相同的空间灵敏度。BOLD可能更难以量化。目前,这两种方法是互补的,它们提供的数据增强了对每种模式结果的解释。最近的数据表明,弛豫率可用于量化分离血液中的脱氧血红蛋白,并且在特定条件下,近红外光谱法测量的脱氧血红蛋白含量与磁共振成像测量的弛豫率变化之间存在很强的相关性。这些数据表明,BOLD成像有可能成为近红外光谱法的一个有吸引力的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验