• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较多西他赛和紫杉醇在晚期乳腺癌患者中的成本效用模型。

Cost-utility model comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients.

作者信息

Brown R E, Hutton J

机构信息

MEDTAP International, Inc, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Anticancer Drugs. 1998 Nov;9(10):899-907. doi: 10.1097/00001813-199811000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00001813-199811000-00009
PMID:9890701
Abstract

Relevant data from direct comparisons in clinical trials are not available for economic evaluations of docetaxel and paclitaxel in the management of metastatic breast cancer. A modified Markov model is used to estimate the incremental cost in US$ per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for docetaxel versus paclitaxel in managing metastatic breast cancer patients in the US. The model incorporates the latest available clinical trial data (response rates of 47.8% for docetaxel and 25% for paclitaxel, chemotherapy-specific toxicities, time to progression, and 1-year survival) from studies against other comparators. Medical care resources were estimated by US oncologists and costed using US data sources. Utility scores were obtained from 29 US oncology nurses. The base case and subsequent sensitivity analyses show that docetaxel management of advanced breast cancer is more costly per patient but yields higher health benefits than paclitaxel therapy. The cost per QALY gained by docetaxel is $8615, and ranges between $3943 and $9416 in sensitivity analyses. These results confirm those of an earlier model using preliminary data and compare favorably with other cost-utility results in this patient group.

摘要

在转移性乳腺癌治疗中,关于多西他赛和紫杉醇的经济学评估,尚无来自临床试验直接比较的相关数据。采用一种改良的马尔可夫模型,来估算在美国治疗转移性乳腺癌患者时,多西他赛相对于紫杉醇每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本(以美元计)。该模型纳入了针对其他对照物的研究中的最新临床试验数据(多西他赛的缓解率为47.8%,紫杉醇为25%,化疗特异性毒性、疾病进展时间和1年生存率)。美国肿瘤学家估算了医疗护理资源,并使用美国数据源进行成本核算。效用评分来自29名美国肿瘤护士。基础病例及后续敏感性分析表明,晚期乳腺癌的多西他赛治疗每位患者的成本更高,但比紫杉醇治疗产生更高的健康效益。多西他赛获得每QALY的成本为8615美元,在敏感性分析中介于3943美元至9416美元之间。这些结果证实了早期使用初步数据的模型的结果,并且与该患者群体的其他成本效用结果相比具有优势。

相似文献

1
Cost-utility model comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients.比较多西他赛和紫杉醇在晚期乳腺癌患者中的成本效用模型。
Anticancer Drugs. 1998 Nov;9(10):899-907. doi: 10.1097/00001813-199811000-00009.
2
An economic evaluation of docetaxel and paclitaxel regimens in metastatic breast cancer in the UK.英国转移性乳腺癌中多西紫杉醇和紫杉醇方案的经济评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(10):847-59. doi: 10.2165/10899510-000000000-00000.
3
Docetaxel. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.多西他赛。对其用于治疗转移性乳腺癌的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Oct;14(4):447-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814040-00010.
4
Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK.英国晚期乳腺癌治疗方案的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1091-102. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00003.
5
Cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy using paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinorelbine for patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer.多西他赛、紫杉醇或长春瑞滨化疗用于蒽环类耐药乳腺癌患者的成本效用分析
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Oct;17(10):3082-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3082.
6
Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain.西班牙转移性乳腺癌患者在接受蒽环类化疗后进展时,多西紫杉醇每周 1 次与紫杉醇的成本效益分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2010 Oct;12(10):692-700. doi: 10.1007/s12094-010-0579-4.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the taxanes used in the treatment of advanced breast and ovarian cancer.对用于治疗晚期乳腺癌和卵巢癌的紫杉烷类药物的有效性和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(17):1-113.
8
Cost-utility analysis of taxane therapy.紫杉烷疗法的成本效用分析。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Dec 15;54(24 Suppl 2):S11-5. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/54.suppl_2.S11.
9
Taxanes for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.紫杉烷类用于早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Oct;11(40):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta11400.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel versus weekly paclitaxel in adjuvant treatment of regional breast cancer in New Zealand.多西他赛与每周一次紫杉醇用于新西兰局部乳腺癌辅助治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jul;32(7):707-24. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0154-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Albumin Paclitaxel versus Docetaxel in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.白蛋白紫杉醇与多西他赛治疗乳腺癌的疗效的 Meta 分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 8;2021:7020177. doi: 10.1155/2021/7020177. eCollection 2021.
2
Does Methodological Guidance Produce Consistency? A Review of Methodological Consistency in Breast Cancer Utility Value Measurement in NICE Single Technology Appraisals.方法学指南能产生一致性吗?对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估中乳腺癌效用值测量的方法学一致性的综述。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Jun;2(2):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0040-5.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
降低早期乳腺癌或非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率的预防性治疗策略的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):425-438. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0474-0.
4
Economic evaluations of trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and critique.曲妥珠单抗用于HER2阳性转移性乳腺癌的经济学评估:一项系统综述与评论
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Jan;15(1):93-112. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0459-2. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
5
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症预防用粒细胞集落刺激因子:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Sep 23;11:404. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-404.
6
Government use licenses in Thailand: an assessment of the health and economic impacts.泰国政府使用许可证:对健康和经济影响的评估。
Global Health. 2011 Aug 14;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-28.
7
COPD uncovered: an international survey on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] on a working age population.慢阻肺揭秘:一项针对工作年龄人群慢阻肺影响的国际调查。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 1;11:612. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-612.
8
Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain.西班牙转移性乳腺癌患者在接受蒽环类化疗后进展时,多西紫杉醇每周 1 次与紫杉醇的成本效益分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2010 Oct;12(10):692-700. doi: 10.1007/s12094-010-0579-4.
9
Cost effectiveness of TAC versus FAC in adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.TAC 对比 FAC 用于淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助治疗的成本效益分析。
Curr Oncol. 2010 Feb;17(1):7-16. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i1.445.
10
An economic evaluation of docetaxel and paclitaxel regimens in metastatic breast cancer in the UK.英国转移性乳腺癌中多西紫杉醇和紫杉醇方案的经济评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(10):847-59. doi: 10.2165/10899510-000000000-00000.