Giangrande A
Nephrology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale di Circolo di Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Int J Artif Organs. 1998 Nov;21(11):721-5.
According to a recent definition, quality of care consists of the degree to which health services increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge; a definition that introduces both requirements of outcomes and the appropriateness of the process used. Clearly many different figures are interested in quality assessment initiatives in the health care field and these include patients, administrators and doctors each having different perspective. Doctors obviously pay greater attention to technical quality and results, giving greater emphasis to the health of the individual patient, tending to give priority to technical excellence and interaction between patient and doctor. Although the perspective of health care professionals is widely acknowledged to be important and useful, other perspectives on quality have been emphasised in recent years. The most important of these is the recognition that care must be responsive to the preferences and values of the consumers of health care services. In complete harmony with one's own professional commitment, the attention to the perspectives of patients must give physician the chance to identify methods of measuring and verifying quality which take account of the expectations of the many groups with an interest in improving the functioning of the health system. A global approach in the health field is needed the more specialization advances. The quality of medicine lies in its capacity to integrate what science says is appropriate and to be recommended, what can be reconciled with human rights and the self determination of the patient and what can be achieved by optimising available resources. In this complex context, the doctor could take on both the role of the person who decides on the use of resources and the one of social mediator.
根据最近的定义,医疗质量包括卫生服务提高实现预期健康结果的可能性并与当前专业知识相符的程度;这一定义引入了结果要求和所用过程的适当性。显然,医疗保健领域中有许多不同的群体对质量评估举措感兴趣,其中包括患者、管理人员和医生,他们各自有着不同的视角。医生显然更关注技术质量和结果,更强调个体患者的健康,往往优先考虑技术卓越以及患者与医生之间的互动。尽管医疗保健专业人员的视角被广泛认为是重要且有用的,但近年来也强调了对质量的其他视角。其中最重要的是认识到医疗必须回应医疗保健服务消费者的偏好和价值观。在完全符合自身专业承诺的情况下,关注患者的视角必须使医生有机会确定衡量和验证质量的方法,这些方法要考虑到众多对改善卫生系统运作感兴趣的群体的期望。随着专业化程度的提高,卫生领域需要一种全球方法。医学的质量在于其整合科学上认为合适且应被推荐的内容、与患者人权和自决权相协调的内容以及通过优化可用资源能够实现的内容的能力。在这种复杂的背景下,医生既可以承担决定资源使用的人的角色,也可以承担社会调解人的角色。