Barth K H, Strandberg J D, Kaufman S L, White R I
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Sep;131(3):455-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.3.455.
Original Gianturco steel coil vascular embolization devices and two modifications were compared for their occlusive effects and for the degree of adverse reaction in the surrounding vessel wall. Modifications consisted of silk or Ivalon replacing the wool strands of the original device. Single coils were placed into the left renal artery of nine mixed breed swine and restudied 3 months later. The bare coils did not occlude the vessels nor lead to significant foreign body reaction. Wool, silk, and Ivalon coils produced prompt and sustained renal artery occlusion. Upon histologic examination of the vessel wall, foreign body and chronic inflammatory reaction was found to be strongest against wool. This reaction was less with silk and markedly diminished with Ivalon. The results indicate that silk and Ivalon coils, while having the same occlusive effect, are preferable to wool coils if less local reaction is desired.
比较了原始的 Gianturco 钢圈血管栓塞装置及其两种改良装置的闭塞效果以及对周围血管壁的不良反应程度。改良之处在于用丝线或聚氯乙烯海绵替代原始装置中的羊毛束。将单个钢圈置入 9 只杂种猪的左肾动脉,并在 3 个月后再次进行研究。裸钢圈未闭塞血管,也未导致明显的异物反应。羊毛、丝线和聚氯乙烯海绵钢圈均能迅速且持续地闭塞肾动脉。对血管壁进行组织学检查时,发现针对羊毛的异物和慢性炎症反应最为强烈。丝线引起的这种反应较小,而聚氯乙烯海绵引起的反应则明显减弱。结果表明,丝线和聚氯乙烯海绵钢圈虽然具有相同的闭塞效果,但如果希望减少局部反应,它们比羊毛钢圈更可取。