Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Goddeeris B M
Laboratory of Veterinary Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiteit Gent, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Infect Immun. 1999 Feb;67(2):520-6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.2.520-526.1999.
F4 receptor-positive (F4R+) and F4 receptor-negative (F4R-) pigs were orally vaccinated with purified F4 fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses were readily detected in F4R+ animals, whereas immune responses were not detected in F4R- animals. Even after a subsequent oral infection with virulent F4(+) ETEC and a booster immunization with F4, the F4R- animals remained F4 seronegative whereas the unvaccinated F4R+ pigs exhibited clear IgA and IgG responses. These results clearly demonstrate that F4Rs are a prerequisite for an immune response following oral immunization. Furthermore, indications that oral F4 vaccination can induce mucosal protection were obtained, since the experimental ETEC infection did not induce a systemic booster response or fecal ETEC excretion in orally vaccinated F4R+ pigs, in contrast to the clear immune response and ETEC excretion of unvaccinated F4R+ animals. F4-specific IgA antibodies could be found in the feces of the vaccinated F4R+ pigs. They are secreted at the intestinal mucosal surface and appear to prevent ETEC infection. The F4R-dependent induction of a mucosal immune response can be used as a model to better understand mucosal immunization and mucosal immune responses and can contribute to the development of oral vaccines in veterinary as well as in human medicine.
将产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)的纯化F4菌毛经口接种F4受体阳性(F4R +)和F4受体阴性(F4R -)猪。在F4R +动物中很容易检测到血清免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和IgA反应,而在F4R -动物中未检测到免疫反应。即使随后用强毒F4(+)ETEC进行口服感染并用F4进行加强免疫,F4R -动物仍保持F4血清阴性,而未接种疫苗的F4R +猪则表现出明显的IgA和IgG反应。这些结果清楚地表明,F4R是口服免疫后产生免疫反应的先决条件。此外,由于与未接种疫苗的F4R +动物明显的免疫反应和ETEC排泄情况相比,实验性ETEC感染在经口接种的F4R +猪中未诱导全身加强反应或粪便ETEC排泄,因此获得了口服F4疫苗可诱导黏膜保护的迹象。在接种疫苗的F4R +猪的粪便中可以发现F4特异性IgA抗体。它们在肠道黏膜表面分泌,似乎可以预防ETEC感染。F4R依赖性黏膜免疫反应的诱导可以用作模型,以更好地理解黏膜免疫和黏膜免疫反应,并有助于兽医学和人类医学中口服疫苗的开发。