Suppr超能文献

征求患者的议程安排:我们有进步吗?

Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?

作者信息

Marvel M K, Epstein R M, Flowers K, Beckman H B

机构信息

Fort Collins Family Medicine Residency Program, CO, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1999 Jan 20;281(3):283-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.3.283.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Previous research indicates physicians frequently choose a patient problem to explore before determining the patient's full spectrum of concerns.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent to which experienced family physicians in various practice settings elicit the agenda of concerns patients bring to the office.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey using linguistic analysis of a convenience sample of 264 patient-physician interviews.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Primary care offices of 29 board-certified family physicians practicing in rural Washington (n = 1; 3%), semirural Colorado (n = 20; 69%), and urban settings in the United States and Canada (n = 8; 27%). Nine participants had fellowship training in communication skills and family counseling.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-physician verbal interactions, including physician solicitations of patient concerns, rate of completion of patient responses, length of time for patient responses, and frequency of late-arising patient concerns.

RESULTS

Physicians solicited patient concerns in 199 interviews (75.4%). Patients' initial statements of concerns were completed in 74 interviews (28.0%). Physicians redirected the patient's opening statement after a mean of 23.1 seconds. Patients allowed to complete their statement of concerns used only 6 seconds more on average than those who were redirected before completion of concerns. Late-arising concerns were more common when physicians did not solicit patient concerns during the interview (34.9% vs 14.9%). Fellowship-trained physicians were more likely to solicit patient concerns and allow patients to complete their initial statement of concerns (44% vs 22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians often redirect patients' initial descriptions of their concerns. Once redirected, the descriptions are rarely completed. Consequences of incomplete initial descriptions include late-arising concerns and missed opportunities to gather potentially important patient data. Soliciting the patient's agenda takes little time and can improve interview efficiency and yield increased data.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,医生在确定患者所有担忧之前,常常会先选择一个患者问题进行探究。

目的

研究不同执业环境下经验丰富的家庭医生在多大程度上引出患者带到诊所的担忧事项清单。

设计

一项横断面调查,对264例患者-医生访谈的便利样本进行语言分析。

地点和参与者

29名获得委员会认证的家庭医生的基层医疗诊所,他们分别在华盛顿州农村地区执业(n = 1;3%)、科罗拉多州半农村地区执业(n = 20;69%)以及美国和加拿大的城市地区执业(n = 8;27%)。9名参与者接受过沟通技巧和家庭咨询方面的 fellowship 培训。

主要观察指标

患者-医生的言语互动,包括医生对患者担忧的询问、患者回应的完成率、患者回应的时长以及后期出现的患者担忧的频率。

结果

在199次访谈中(75.4%)医生询问了患者的担忧事项。在74次访谈中(28.0%)患者对担忧的初步陈述得以完成。医生平均在23.1秒后重新引导患者的开场陈述。被允许完成担忧陈述的患者平均比在担忧陈述完成前被重新引导的患者多用6秒。当医生在访谈中未询问患者担忧事项时,后期出现的担忧更为常见(34.9% 对 14.9%)。接受过 fellowship 培训的医生更有可能询问患者担忧事项并允许患者完成对担忧的初步陈述(44% 对 22%)。

结论

医生常常重新引导患者对其担忧的初步描述。一旦被重新引导,这些描述很少能完成。初步描述不完整的后果包括后期出现的担忧以及错过收集潜在重要患者数据的机会。询问患者的事项清单耗时不多,且可提高访谈效率并获取更多数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验