• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视议程设置:基层医疗医生何时以及如何征求患者的其他担忧?

Agenda-setting revisited: When and how do primary-care physicians solicit patients' additional concerns?

作者信息

Robinson Jeffrey D, Tate Alexandra, Heritage John

机构信息

Portland State University, Department of Communication, University Center Building, 520 SW Harrison Street, Suite 440, Portland, OR 97201, USA.

University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Sociology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.009
PMID:26733124
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Soliciting patients' complete agendas of concerns (aka. 'agenda setting') can improve patients' health outcomes and satisfaction, and physicians' time management. We assess the distribution, content, and effectiveness of physicians' post-chief-complaint, agenda-setting questions.

METHODS

We coded videotapes/transcripts of 407 primary-, acute-care visits between adults and 85 general-practice physicians operating in 46 community-based clinics in two states representing urban and rural care. Measures are the incidence of physicians' questions, their linguistic format, position within visits, likelihood of being responded to, and the nature of such responses.

RESULTS

Physicians' questions designed to solicit concerns additional to chief concerns occurred in only 32% of visits (p<.001). Compared to questions whose communication format explicitly solicited 'questions' (e.g., "Do you have any questions?"), those that were formatted so as to allow for 'concerns' (e.g., "Any other concerns?") were significantly more likely to generate some type of agenda item (Chi(2) (1, N=131)=11.96, p=.001), and to do so more frequently when positioned 'early' vs. 'late' during visits (Chi(2) (1, N=73)=4.99, p=.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Agenda setting is comparatively infrequent. The communication format and position of physicians' questions affects patients' provision of additional concerns/questions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Physicians should increase use of optimized forms of agenda setting.

摘要

目的

征求患者完整的关切事项议程(即“议程设定”)可改善患者的健康状况和满意度,以及医生的时间管理。我们评估医生在提出主要诉求后的议程设定问题的分布、内容和有效性。

方法

我们对407例成人与85名在两个州的46家社区诊所执业的全科医生进行的基层医疗、急症护理就诊的录像带/文字记录进行编码。衡量指标包括医生提问的发生率、语言形式、就诊中的位置、得到回应的可能性以及此类回应的性质。

结果

旨在征求主要关切之外其他关切的医生提问仅出现在32%的就诊中(p<0.001)。与那些沟通形式明确征求“问题”的问题(例如,“你有什么问题吗?”)相比,那些以允许提出“关切”的形式提出的问题(例如,“还有其他关切吗?”)更有可能产生某种类型的议程项目(卡方检验(2)(1,N = 131)= 11.96,p = 0.001),并且在就诊期间“早”与“晚”提出时更频繁地产生议程项目(卡方检验(2)(1,N = 73)= 4.99,p = 0.025)。

结论

议程设定相对较少见。医生提问的沟通形式和位置会影响患者提出额外的关切/问题。

实践意义

医生应增加使用优化形式的议程设定。

相似文献

1
Agenda-setting revisited: When and how do primary-care physicians solicit patients' additional concerns?重新审视议程设置:基层医疗医生何时以及如何征求患者的其他担忧?
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
2
How patients understand physicians' solicitations of additional concerns: implications for up-front agenda setting in primary care.患者如何理解医生对额外问题的询问:对初级保健中预先议程设定的影响。
Health Commun. 2016;31(4):434-44. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.960060. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
3
Physicians' opening questions and patients' satisfaction.医生的开场问题与患者满意度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.009. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
4
The structure of patients' presenting concerns: physicians' opening questions.患者当前担忧的结构:医生的开场问题。
Health Commun. 2006;19(2):89-102. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1.
5
Reducing patients' unmet concerns in primary care: the difference one word can make.减少初级保健中患者未得到满足的担忧:一个词就能产生的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1429-33. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
6
Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?征求患者的议程安排:我们有进步吗?
JAMA. 1999 Jan 20;281(3):283-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.3.283.
7
Agenda Setting During Follow-Up Encounters in a University Primary Care Outpatient Clinic.大学初级保健门诊随访期间的议程设定
Health Commun. 2017 Jun;32(6):714-720. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1168003. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
'The Hand on the Doorknob': Visit Agenda Setting by Complex Patients and Their Primary Care Physicians.《门把手之握:复杂患者及其初级保健医生的就诊议程设置》。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;31(1):29-37. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170167.
9
Effects of a self-administered previsit questionnaire to enhance awareness of patients' concerns in primary care.一份自我管理的就诊前问卷对提高初级保健中患者关注点认知的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Oct;12(10):597-606. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07119.x.
10
Effectiveness of intensive physician training in upfront agenda setting.强化医生培训在预先设定议程方面的效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1317-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1773-y. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Health Care Communication in Treatment Outcomes.医疗保健沟通在治疗结果中的作用。
Annu Rev Linguist. 2023 Jan;9:233-252. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-054400. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
Agenda-setting in the clinical encounter: A systematic review protocol.临床医患交流中的议程设置:系统综述方案
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312613. eCollection 2024.
3
The Medicare annual wellness visit: An opportunity to improve health system identification of hearing loss?医疗保险年度健康访视:改善健康系统识别听力损失的机会?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3089-3097. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19111. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
4
The Potential of Advanced Rooming to Improve Communication and Visit Efficiency in Federally Qualified Health Centers.高级预诊室在改善联邦合格健康中心沟通和就诊效率方面的潜力。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2024;47(4):271-277. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000504. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
5
Communication in Primary Healthcare: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research.初级医疗保健中的沟通:对话分析研究的最新文献综述
Res Lang Soc Interact. 2024 Apr 3;57(1):7-37. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2024.2305038. eCollection 2024.
6
Challenges to Exploring the Patient Perspective in Palliative Care Conversations: A Qualitative Study Among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Heart Failure Patients and Their Health Care Professionals.在姑息治疗对话中探索患者观点所面临的挑战:一项针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病和慢性心力衰竭患者及其医护人员的定性研究
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Apr 5;5(1):150-161. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0071. eCollection 2024.
7
What Humans Need.人类的需求
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Sep-Oct;21(5):465-467. doi: 10.1370/afm.3015.
8
Family medicine teaching strategy for managing patients with comorbidity: Collect, cluster, and coordinate.管理合并症患者的家庭医学教学策略:收集、聚类和协调。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 Jul;69(7):507-510. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6907507.
9
Addressing colon cancer patients' needs during follow-up consultations at the outpatient clinic: a multicenter qualitative observational study.在门诊随访中满足结肠癌患者的需求:一项多中心定性观察研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):7893-7901. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07222-z. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Antibiotic Prescribing and Doctor-Patient Communication During Consultations for Respiratory Tract Infections: A Video Observation Study in Out-of-Hours Primary Care.呼吸道感染会诊期间的抗生素处方与医患沟通:非工作时间基层医疗的视频观察研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 1;8:735276. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.735276. eCollection 2021.