Suppr超能文献

尿液中苯二氮䓬类药物的不同免疫分析方法比较及气相色谱-质谱筛查

Comparison of different immunoassays and GC-MS screening of benzodiazepines in urine.

作者信息

Augsburger M, Rivier L, Mangin P

机构信息

Institut Universitaire de Médecine Légale, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998 Dec;18(4-5):681-7. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(98)00266-0.

Abstract

A total of 53 urine samples were tested by different immunoassay methods and by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to determine repeatability of the different methods and to assess whether the immunoassays performed on samples obtained from elderly patients of the emergency section could be considered as reliable enough for identifying a benzodiazepine consumption. Repeatability was excellent for GC/MS and good for immunoassays. The specificity was not different for the three immunoassays (96%). The sensitivity varied from 36, 64 to 75% for OnLine, RIA Immunalysis and RIA DPC, respectively. An other difference between immunoassays and GC/MS was the ability of GC/MS to detect lorazepam and low concentrations of benzodiazepines whereas immunoassays did not.

摘要

总共53份尿液样本通过不同的免疫分析方法和气相色谱/质谱法进行检测,以确定不同方法的重复性,并评估对急诊科老年患者样本进行的免疫分析是否足以可靠地识别苯二氮䓬类药物的使用情况。气相色谱/质谱法的重复性极佳,免疫分析的重复性良好。三种免疫分析的特异性无差异(96%)。在线免疫分析、放射免疫分析(Immunalysis)和放射免疫分析(RIA DPC)的灵敏度分别为36%、64%和75%。免疫分析和气相色谱/质谱法的另一个差异在于,气相色谱/质谱法能够检测劳拉西泮和低浓度的苯二氮䓬类药物,而免疫分析则不能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验