Nishikawa T, Ohtani H, Herold D A, Fitzgerald R L
Department of Clinical Pathology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 Mar;107(3):345-52. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/107.3.345.
We analyzed 127 urine samples for benzodiazepines by a radioreceptor assay and two immunoassays (cloned enzyme donor immunoassay [CEDIA, Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind] and agglutination immunoassay [ONLINE, Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, NJ]). Sixty samples that were positive by at least one of these assays were submitted to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, which detected benzodiazepines such as oxazepam, nordiazepam, and lorazepam in 44 samples. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the receptor assay were almost equal or superior to those of the two immunoassays, although discrepant results were obtained in some samples. The discrepancies resulted from differences in the cross-reactivity of these assays. For example, the receptor assay could detect lorazepam, while the two immunoassays could not, and CEDIA was interfered with by a metabolite of sertraline while the others were not. This is the first report showing the utility of a receptor assay for screening benzodiazepines in urine.
我们通过放射受体分析法和两种免疫分析法(克隆酶供体免疫分析法[CEDIA,德国勃林格殷格翰公司,印第安纳波利斯,印第安纳州]和凝集免疫分析法[ONLINE,罗氏诊断系统公司,布兰奇堡,新泽西州])对127份尿液样本进行了苯二氮䓬类药物分析。通过这些分析方法中至少一种检测为阳性的60份样本被送去进行气相色谱-质谱联用分析,该分析在44份样本中检测出了奥沙西泮、去甲西泮和劳拉西泮等苯二氮䓬类药物。尽管在一些样本中得到了不一致的结果,但受体分析法的诊断敏感性和特异性几乎与两种免疫分析法相当或更高。这些差异是由这些分析方法交叉反应性的不同导致的。例如,受体分析法能够检测出劳拉西泮,而两种免疫分析法却不能,并且CEDIA会受到舍曲林一种代谢物的干扰,而其他方法则不会。这是首份展示受体分析法在尿液中苯二氮䓬类药物筛查方面效用的报告。