Santos Kátia R N, Teixeira Lücia M, Leal G S, Fonseca Leila S, Gontijo Filho P P
Departamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, MS.
Departamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.
J Med Microbiol. 1999 Jan;48(1):17-23. doi: 10.1099/00222615-48-1-17.
Control and prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections should include early identification of patients at higher risk of MRSA acquisition and analysis of isolates by discriminatory bacterial DNA typing methods. One hundred and three MRSA isolates cultured between Sept. 1994 and Sept. 1995 from 62 patients in two teaching hospitals (hospital 1, in Rio de Janeiro; hospital 2, in Minas Gerais) were tested for antimicrobial resistance and genomic DNA was analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Ten profiles were identified: A, B, C, I and J in hospital 1 and A, B, D, E, F, G and H in hospital 2. PFGE patterns A and B were isolated at both hospitals. The majority (80%) of isolates had similar PFGE patterns (type A). Subtype A1 was isolated at both hospitals, but was more frequent in hospital 2 (54%), while subtype A2 predominated in hospital 1 (63%). MRSA isolates were resistant to the majority of antimicrobial agents tested. However, susceptibility to vancomycin alone was found in 32% of the isolates at hospital 1, whereas 48% of isolates from hospital 2 were susceptible to both vancomycin and mupirocin, and 34% demonstrated susceptibility to vancomycin, mupirocin and chloramphenicol. Thirty-nine percent of all isolates were mupirocin-resistant, with 90% of these belonging to PFGE pattern A. Four main risk factors were associated with MRSA infection or colonisation which may be useful in the early identification of patients at risk: >7 days hospitalisation (95%), very dependent patients (84%), invasive procedures (79%) and recent antimicrobial therapy (79%). The data demonstrate that PFGE pattern A is disseminated in both hospitals. However, at both hospitals subtypes of pattern A and the other PFGE types were associated with different antibiotic resistance patterns.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的控制与预防应包括早期识别MRSA感染风险较高的患者,并通过鉴别性细菌DNA分型方法对分离株进行分析。对1994年9月至1995年9月期间从两家教学医院(里约热内卢的医院1和米纳斯吉拉斯的医院2)的62名患者中培养出的103株MRSA分离株进行了抗菌药物耐药性检测,并通过脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)分析了基因组DNA。共鉴定出10种图谱:医院1中的A、B、C、I和J,以及医院2中的A、B、D、E、F、G和H。PFGE图谱A和B在两家医院均有分离。大多数(80%)分离株具有相似的PFGE图谱(A型)。A1亚型在两家医院均有分离,但在医院2中更为常见(54%),而A2亚型在医院1中占主导(63%)。MRSA分离株对大多数测试抗菌药物耐药。然而,医院1中32%的分离株仅对万古霉素敏感,而医院2中48%的分离株对万古霉素和莫匹罗星均敏感,34%的分离株对万古霉素、莫匹罗星和氯霉素敏感。所有分离株中有39%对莫匹罗星耐药,其中90%属于PFGE图谱A。与MRSA感染或定植相关的四个主要危险因素可能有助于早期识别高危患者:住院时间>7天(95%)、极度依赖患者(84%)、侵入性操作(79%)和近期抗菌治疗(79%)。数据表明PFGE图谱A在两家医院均有传播。然而,在两家医院,A图谱的亚型和其他PFGE类型与不同的抗生素耐药模式相关。