Evaluation of methods for detecting alloantibodies underlying warm autoantibodies.

BACKGROUND

In pretransfusion testing of patients whose sera contain autoantibodies reacting optimally at 37 degrees C, it must be determined whether alloantibodies are also present. Two approaches, testing a 1-in-5 dilution of patients' sera and the adsorption of sera in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG), have been proposed as alternatives to the time-consuming approach of adsorbing sera with ficin- or ZZAP-treated red cells (RBCs). The three approaches were compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients' sera containing warm autoantibodies, with and without alloantibodies, were retested 1) after dilution (1-in-5) and 2) after adsorption with allogeneic RBCs in the presence of PEG. Results were compared to those after adsorption with ZZAP-treated allogeneic RBCs.

RESULTS

Dilution (1-in-5): Twenty-seven of 119 sera (7/26 [27%] with and 20/93 [22%] without alloantibodies) did not react; one example each of alloanti-D, -E, -e, -Fy(a), and -Jk(a), and two examples of anti-Jk(b) were not detected at a dilution of 1 in 5. Alloantibodies were identified in 5 (19%) of 26 1-in-5 diluted sera containing alloantibodies; 87 (73%) of 119 sera still reacted with all cells and would have required further workup. PEG adsorption: Thirty-nine sera were tested after parallel PEG and ZZAP adsorptions. The PEG adsorptions required a total of 55 aliquots of adsorbing cells and 13.75 hours, whereas ZZAP adsorptions required 61 aliquots and 30.5 hours. All alloantibodies (anti-D [3], -C [2], -c [1], -E [4], -K [2], -Fy(a) [1], -Jk(a) [2], -Jk(b) [1]) reacted in the adsorbed serum-PEG mixtures at a strength equal to or greater than that in the ZZAP-adsorbed sera.

CONCLUSION

Although the 1-in-5 dilution approach is convenient, only 22 percent of warm autoantibodies without alloantibodies were nonreactive, and 27 percent of alloantibodies of potential clinical significance were not detected. PEG adsorption appears to give similar results to those of ZZAP adsorption, but it has the advantages of eliminating the cost and time of prior treatment of the allogeneic adsorbing cells and of a reduction of at least a 50 percent in adsorption time.