• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医学生评估方法]

[Methods in the evaluation of medical students].

作者信息

Tscherning T, Christensen H C, Bilde A, Thomsen H S, Jaszczak P P

机构信息

Røntgenafdelingen, Amtssygehuset i Herlev.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Jan 4;161(1):22-6.

PMID:9922683
Abstract

The achievements of medical students are decisively dependent on the method of evaluation during their education. Frequent testing of these achievements by well-defined (cross-specialized) problems (involving cases) enables the student to quickly correct own knowledge- or skills-deficiencies, while the relevance of the curriculum is further visualized. A differentiated panel of tests evaluates both the students individual study methods and her ability to make clinical inquiry, diagnoses and application of practical skills. An insufficient individual performance graded by known minimal specific standards entails a feedback session with a counsellor who pin-points defects in the student's knowledge and suggests methods for correction. This form of evaluation is expected to be costly, but is a necessity to improve the quality of the graduating medical students.

摘要

医学生的成绩在很大程度上取决于其教育过程中的评估方法。通过明确界定的(跨专业)问题(包括病例)对这些成绩进行频繁测试,能使学生迅速纠正自身知识或技能方面的不足,同时课程的相关性也能得到进一步体现。一组差异化的测试既能评估学生的个人学习方法,又能评估其进行临床问诊、诊断和应用实践技能的能力。若根据已知的最低特定标准评定个人表现不足,则需与辅导员进行反馈面谈,辅导员会指出学生知识方面的缺陷并提出纠正方法。这种评估形式预计成本较高,但对于提高即将毕业的医学生的质量而言是必要的。

相似文献

1
[Methods in the evaluation of medical students].[医学生评估方法]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Jan 4;161(1):22-6.
2
[The use of a portfolio in the medical curriculum].[医学课程中档案袋的使用]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 May 17;166(21):2009-11.
3
[Effects of problem-based medical education: 16 Dutch curriculum comparisons].[基于问题的医学教育的效果:16项荷兰课程比较]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 May 13;150(19):1085-9.
4
Reasoning versus knowledge retention and ascertainment throughout a problem-based learning curriculum.基于问题的学习课程中推理与知识保留和确定的关系。
Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):854-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03410.x.
5
[Learning clinical skills].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Sep 1;165(36):3405-9.
6
Maximizing the value of feedback for individual facilitator and faculty development in a problem-based learning curriculum.在基于问题的学习课程中,最大化反馈对个体促进者和教师发展的价值。
Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):e26-31. doi: 10.1080/01421590601032435.
7
Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.在基于创新能力的课程中评估学生对基础科学知识的掌握、应用和整合的方法。
Med Teach. 2008;30(7):e171-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590802139740.
8
Solving the problem of how medical students solve problems.解决医学生如何解决问题的问题。
MD Comput. 1991 Jan-Feb;8(1):13-20.
9
How do clinical clerkship students experience simulator-based teaching? A qualitative analysis.临床实习学生如何体验基于模拟器的教学?一项定性分析。
Simul Healthc. 2006 Winter;1(4):215-9. doi: 10.1097/01.SIH.0000245787.40980.89.
10
Student selected components: student-designed modules are associated with closer alignment of planned and learnt outcomes.学生自选内容:学生设计的模块与计划学习成果和实际学习成果的紧密一致有关。
Med Teach. 2009 Oct;31(10):e489-93. doi: 10.3109/01421590903258688.