Pittet D, Harbarth S, Ruef C, Francioli P, Sudre P, Pétignat C, Trampuz A, Widmer A
University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Jan;20(1):37-42. doi: 10.1086/501554.
To determine the prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infections (NIs) in four Swiss university hospitals.
A 1-week period-prevalence survey conducted in May 1996 in medical, surgical, and intensive-care wards of four Swiss university hospitals (900-1,500 beds). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions were used, except that asymptomatic bacteriuria was not categorized as NI. Study variables included patient demographics, primary diagnosis, comorbidities, exposure to medical and surgical risk factors, and use of antimicrobials. Risk factors for NIs were determined using logistic regression with adjustment for length of hospital stay, study center, device use, and patients' comorbidities.
176 NI were recorded in 156 of 1,349 screened patients (11.6%; interhospital range, 9.8%-13.5%). The most frequent NI was surgical-site infection (53; 30%), followed by urinary tract infection (39; 22%), lower respiratory tract infection (27; 15%), and bloodstream infection (23; 13%). Prevalence of NI was higher in critical-care units (25%) than in medical (9%) and surgical wards (12%). Overall, 65% of NIs were culture-proven; the leading pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae (44; 28%), Staphylococcus aureus (20; 13%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17; 11%), and Candida species (16; 10%). Independent risk factors for NI were central venous catheter (CVC) use (odds ratio [OR], 3.35; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 2.91-3.80), admission to intensive care (OR, 1.75; CI95, 1.30-2.21), emergency admission (OR, 1.57; CI95, 1.15-2.00), impaired functional status (Karnofsky index 1-4: OR, 2.56; CI95, 1.953.17), and McCabe classification of ultimately fatal (OR, 2.50; CI95, 2.04-2.96) or rapidly fatal (OR, 2.25; CI95, 1.52-2.98) underlying condition.
According to the results of this survey, NIs are frequent in Swiss university hospitals. This investigation confirms the importance of CVCs as a major risk factor for NI. Patient comorbidities must be taken into account to adjust for case mix in any study comparing interhospital or intrahospital infection rates.
确定瑞士四家大学医院医院感染(NI)的患病率及危险因素。
1996年5月在瑞士四家大学医院(900 - 1500张床位)的内科、外科和重症监护病房进行了为期1周的现患率调查。除无症状菌尿未被归类为医院感染外,采用美国疾病控制与预防中心的定义。研究变量包括患者人口统计学资料、主要诊断、合并症、接触医疗和手术危险因素以及抗菌药物使用情况。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定医院感染的危险因素,并对住院时间、研究中心、器械使用和患者合并症进行校正。
在1349例筛查患者中的156例(11.6%;医院间范围为9.8% - 13.5%)记录到176例医院感染。最常见的医院感染是手术部位感染(53例;30%),其次是尿路感染(39例;22%)、下呼吸道感染(27例;15%)和血流感染(23例;13%)。重症监护病房医院感染患病率(25%)高于内科病房(9%)和外科病房(12%)。总体而言,65%的医院感染经培养证实;主要病原体为肠杆菌科细菌(44例;28%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(20例;13%)、铜绿假单胞菌(17例;11%)和念珠菌属(16例;10%)。医院感染的独立危险因素为中心静脉导管(CVC)的使用(比值比[OR]为3.35;95%置信区间[CI95]为2.91 - 3.80)、入住重症监护病房(OR为1.75;CI95为1.30 - 2.21)、急诊入院(OR为1.57;CI95为1.15 - 2.00)、功能状态受损(卡诺夫斯基指数1 - 4:OR为2.56;CI95为1.95 - 3.17)以及最终致命(OR为2.50;CI95为2.04 - 2.96)或快速致命(OR为2.25;CI95为1.52 - 2.98)基础疾病的麦凯布分类。
根据本次调查结果,瑞士大学医院医院感染较为常见。本研究证实了中心静脉导管作为医院感染主要危险因素的重要性。在比较医院间或医院内感染率的任何研究中,必须考虑患者合并症以调整病例组合。