Gilles M, Wing A M, Kirker S G
Centre for Advanced Studies in Sensory Motor Neuroscience, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jan;124(2):137-44. doi: 10.1007/s002210050607.
The effect of the predictability of perturbation to standing balance was evaluated in terms of the muscle activity and response dynamics of five subjects exposed to horizontal forces at the pelvis producing sideways or forward sway. Rapid (EMG onset latencies of 70-80 ms recorded from the left gluteus medius and gastrocnemius) and qualitatively different patterns of response were produced by forward pushes and pushes to either side. However, the EMG response to left push was constant in pattern and timing, whether the push direction was constant and, therefore, predictable over a block of trials or whether the left push trials were interleaved randomly with right push or forward push trials. Moreover, there were no systematic effects of perturbation direction uncertainty on the latency and rate of increase of ground reaction forces. We conclude that prior information does not speed postural responses that differ quantitatively according to the direction of perturbation to balance.
通过对五名受试者施加作用于骨盆的水平力以产生侧向或向前摇摆,从肌肉活动和反应动力学方面评估了干扰对站立平衡的可预测性的影响。向前推和向两侧推产生了快速的(从左臀中肌和腓肠肌记录到的肌电图起始潜伏期为70 - 80毫秒)且在性质上不同的反应模式。然而,无论推的方向是恒定的,因此在一组试验中是可预测的,还是左推试验与右推或前推试验随机交错,对向左推的肌电图反应在模式和时间上都是恒定的。此外,干扰方向的不确定性对地面反作用力的潜伏期和增加速率没有系统性影响。我们得出结论,先验信息并不会加快根据平衡干扰方向在数量上有所不同的姿势反应。