• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重程度指标:基本概念。

Indexes of severity: underlying concepts.

作者信息

Krischer J P

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1976 Summer;11(2):143-57.

PMID:993048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1071909/
Abstract

Six severity indexes proposed in the health services research literature are shown to be special cases of a class of ordinal ranking functions called additive value functions. Deficiencies manifest in each of the severity indexes are discussed in relation to the properties that additive value functions must satisfy. In that severity indexes are a subset of health status indexes, the properties that imply and are implied by additive value formulations are relevant to the larger class of indexes as well.

摘要

卫生服务研究文献中提出的六个严重程度指标被证明是一类称为加性价值函数的序数排名函数的特殊情况。针对每个严重程度指标中表现出的不足,结合加性价值函数必须满足的属性进行了讨论。由于严重程度指标是健康状况指标的一个子集,加性价值公式所蕴含的属性以及蕴含加性价值公式的属性对于更大类别的指标也具有相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da85/1071909/eae329d60548/hsresearch00551-0054-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da85/1071909/eae329d60548/hsresearch00551-0054-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da85/1071909/eae329d60548/hsresearch00551-0054-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Indexes of severity: underlying concepts.严重程度指标:基本概念。
Health Serv Res. 1976 Summer;11(2):143-57.
2
Indexes of severity: conceptual development.严重程度指标:概念发展
Health Serv Res. 1979 Spring;14(1):56-67.
3
[A multicriteria tool for the analysis of health status indicators of a population. Application to the elaboration of a typology for the use of health indicators].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1982;30(3):325-42.
4
The mortality component of health status indexes.健康状况指数中的死亡率组成部分。
Health Serv Res. 1976 Winter;11(4):370-90.
5
[A method of calculation of integral health status indicators in the complex hygienic evaluation of territories of different hierarchical levels].
Gig Sanit. 1988 Jul(7):63-5.
6
An illness-injury severity index for nonphysician emergency medical personnel.非医师急救医疗人员的伤病严重程度指数
EMT J. 1979 Mar;3(1):45-9.
7
Making annual indexes of health.编制年度健康指数。
Health Serv Res. 1976 Winter;11(4):442-51.
8
Measuring trauma severity: the ESP index.测量创伤严重程度:ESP指数。
Health Serv Res. 1978 Spring;13(1):61-5.
9
[Life expectancy free of disability: global indicator of health status].无残疾预期寿命:健康状况的全球指标
Med Clin (Barc). 1991 Mar 30;96(12):453-5.
10
Measuring functional ability and chronic health conditions among the elderly: a research note on the adequacy of three instruments.老年人功能能力与慢性健康状况的测量:关于三种测量工具适用性的研究笔记
J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Mar;22(1):90-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of mortality in pediatric urban firearm injuries.小儿城市枪支伤死亡率的预测因素
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Jan;33(1):53-58. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3984-0. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
The exponential function transforms the Abbreviated Injury Scale, which both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.指数函数对简明损伤定级标准进行了转换,这既提高了准确性又简化了评分。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Jun;40(3):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0331-1. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
3
Tangent function transformation of the Abbreviated Injury Scale improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.

本文引用的文献

1
Further observations on the newborn scoring system.关于新生儿评分系统的进一步观察
Am J Dis Child. 1962 Oct;104:419-28. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1962.02080030421015.
2
Cumulative illness rating scale.累积疾病评定量表。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1968 May;16(5):622-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1968.tb02103.x.
3
Trauma index. An aide in the evaluation of injury victims.
J Trauma. 1971 Aug;11(8):711-4.
简化损伤定级量表的正切函数变换可提高准确性并简化评分。
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Mar 16;11(1):130-6. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.49209. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
4
Triage system for rural hospital emergency services: Determining how long patients can wait.农村医院急诊服务的分诊系统:确定患者可等待的时长。
Can Fam Physician. 1991 May;37:1252-66.
5
An overview of the injury severity score and the new injury severity score.损伤严重度评分与新损伤严重度评分概述。
Inj Prev. 2001 Mar;7(1):10-3. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.1.10.
6
A new scoring system for disease intensity in a surgical intensive care unit.一种用于外科重症监护病房疾病严重程度的新评分系统。
World J Surg. 1989 May-Jun;13(3):252-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01659030.
7
Measuring trauma severity: comment on Krischer's critique of the ESP index.测量创伤严重程度:对克里舍尔对ESP指数批评的评论
Health Serv Res. 1978 Winter;13(4):434-8.
8
Indexes of severity: underlying concepts--a reply.严重程度指标:基本概念——一则回应
Health Serv Res. 1979 Spring;14(1):68-76.
9
Indexes of severity: conceptual development.严重程度指标:概念发展
Health Serv Res. 1979 Spring;14(1):56-67.
4
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.损伤严重度评分:一种描述多发伤患者及评估急诊治疗的方法。
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96.
5
Rating severity of the injured by ambulance attendants: Field research of trauma index.救护人员对伤者严重程度的评定:创伤指数的现场研究。
J Trauma. 1974 Nov;14(11):934-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197411000-00004.