Waid W M
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 Nov;34(5):923-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.34.5.923.
The present experiment tested the hypothesis that the reduced skin conductance response (SCR) to noxious stimulation shown by sociopathic or undersocialized persons is mediated by the ability to use cues of impending noxious events to attenuate their impact. Eighty young adults, males and females scoring high, medium, or low on the Socialization Scale of the California Psychological Inventory, were exposed to 30 pairings of a warning signal with a 98-dB (SPL) noise while palmar skin conductance and subjective estimations of stimulus intensity were recorded. The interval between warning and noise was varied (0, .5, 1, 3, or 11 sec) for each subject. The low-socialization group gave significantly smaller SCRs to noise than the high-socialization group, revealing a negative relationship between level of socialization and amplitude of the SCR to a noxious stimulus in a normal population. Previous studies reporting this relationship contrasted clinical sociopaths with nonsociopathic control subjects. The differences between groups in the SCR were significant at the 0-sec, (i.e., no warning) as well as the remaining warning intervals, indicating that the difference between groups is not mediated by "cue-utlization" ability. Control procedures permitted excluding differential sensory sensitivity, rates of SCR habituation, and general skin conductance responsivity as mediators of the difference between groups in the SCR to noxious stimulation.
反社会或社会化不足的人对有害刺激表现出的皮肤电导率反应(SCR)降低,是由利用即将发生的有害事件线索来减轻其影响的能力所介导的。80名年轻成年人,包括男性和女性,他们在加利福尼亚心理调查表的社会化量表上得分高、中或低,在记录手掌皮肤电导率和刺激强度主观估计的同时,让他们接触30对警告信号与98分贝(声压级)噪声的配对。每个受试者的警告与噪声之间的间隔是变化的(0、0.5、1、3或11秒)。低社会化组对噪声的SCR明显小于高社会化组,这揭示了在正常人群中,社会化水平与对有害刺激的SCR幅度之间存在负相关关系。先前报告这种关系的研究将临床反社会者与非反社会对照受试者进行了对比。在0秒(即无警告)以及其余警告间隔时,组间SCR的差异均显著,这表明组间差异不是由“线索利用”能力介导的。控制程序允许排除差异感觉敏感性、SCR习惯化率以及一般皮肤电导率反应性作为组间对有害刺激的SCR差异的介导因素。