Yeh C H, Chen H M, Jan Y Y, Hwang T L, Jeng L B, Chen M F
Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan ROC.
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Nov-Dec;45(24):2392-8.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inflammatory masses of the pancreatic head are a dilemma for surgeons, especially when the differences between these lesions and pancreatic head carcinoma are not so clear. The surgical management of these inflammatory benign lesions is also a topic with conflicting opinions. A clinical analysis was performed in an attempt to differentiate between these lesions and malignancy. The results of our observatory strategy of these lesions are also presented.
From 1992 to 1994, 73 patients with ultrasonographically (US) or computed tomographically (CT) heterogenous pancreatic head lesions were diagnosed at the Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Forty-nine of these lesions were neoplastic (Group I), but the remaining 24 patients had inflammatory non-neoplastic lesions (pancreatic inflammatory masses, IPM, Group II), which were diagnosed during laparotomy by core needle biopsy. Surgery and outcome were reviewed. Ten of the 24 patients in group II received biopsy only, and the remaining 14 patients received bypass procedures. At follow-up of at least 16 months of the surviving patients (n=21), only 9.5% were with residual lesions. All cases in group II revealed shrinkage of masses. We focused on the clinical features, hematology, biochemistry, image study, serum CEA and CA 19-9, and compared these variances between the 2 groups.
Three clinical features were statistically different between groups I and II: mean age at presentation of disease (group I vs II = 53.3 vs 65.1), the tendency of a past history of alcoholism (Group II), and presence of abdominal pain (Group II). Group II also showed a higher level of serum alkaline phosphatase and a lower level of total bilirubin as well as a lower level of CA19-9. These inflammatory masses could not be distinguished from the true neoplasms pre-operatively on endoscopic appearance, US, or CT.
Pre-operative differentiation between these pancreatic lesions may be difficult but laparotomy and core needle biopsy remain safe and reliable procedures. Our short-term follow-up justified the bypass surgery and that observatory strategy is enough for those patients with pancreatic head inflammatory masses.
背景/目的:胰头炎性肿块给外科医生带来了难题,尤其是当这些病变与胰头癌之间的差异不那么明显时。这些炎性良性病变的外科治疗也是一个存在争议的话题。进行了一项临床分析,试图区分这些病变与恶性肿瘤。还介绍了我们对这些病变的观察策略的结果。
1992年至1994年,台湾台北长庚纪念医院外科诊断出73例超声(US)或计算机断层扫描(CT)显示胰头异质性病变的患者。其中49例病变为肿瘤性(第一组),但其余24例患者有炎性非肿瘤性病变(胰腺炎性肿块,IPM,第二组),这些病变在剖腹手术中通过芯针活检确诊。回顾了手术情况和结果。第二组的24例患者中有10例仅接受了活检,其余14例患者接受了旁路手术。在对存活患者(n = 21)进行至少16个月的随访时,只有9.5%的患者有残留病变。第二组的所有病例均显示肿块缩小。我们重点关注临床特征、血液学、生物化学、影像学检查、血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9),并比较了两组之间的这些差异。
第一组和第二组之间有三个临床特征在统计学上存在差异:疾病出现时的平均年龄(第一组与第二组 = 53.3岁与65.1岁)、有酗酒史的倾向(第二组)以及腹痛的存在(第二组)。第二组还显示血清碱性磷酸酶水平较高、总胆红素水平较低以及CA19-9水平较低。这些炎性肿块在术前通过内镜表现、超声或CT无法与真正的肿瘤区分开来。
术前区分这些胰腺病变可能很困难,但剖腹手术和芯针活检仍然是安全可靠的程序。我们的短期随访证明了旁路手术的合理性,并且观察策略对于那些患有胰头炎性肿块的患者来说就足够了。