Woolverton W L, Alling K
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216-4505, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Jan;141(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s002130050805.
Previous research has shown that concurrent schedule responding maintained by cocaine under short variable-interval (VI) schedules is well described by the generalized matching law. That is, drug-maintained behavior was apportioned in accordance with relative frequency of reinforcement. The purpose of the present experiment was to examine the ability of the generalized matching law to account for choice under longer VI schedules of cocaine availability, and to compare cocaine-maintained to food-maintained behavior in this regard. One group of rhesus monkeys (n = 4) was prepared with indwelling IV catheters and allowed to respond under concurrent VI (conc VI) schedules of cocaine delivery (0.025, 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg per injection) with an average inter-reinforcer interval (IRI) of 10 or 30 min. In a second group of monkeys (n = 4), a comparable experiment was conducted but with responding maintained by different amounts of food (one, two, or four 1-g banana-flavored pellets). For both groups, the same reinforcer followed responding on either lever, the only difference between the options being the VI schedule, i.e., frequency of reinforcement. The behavior of the cocaine-maintained group was well predicted by the generalized matching law. While both groups evidenced undermatching of both response and time allocation, lever pressing of monkeys whose behavior was maintained by food showed more undermatching than that of the cocaine-maintained group. In addition, a consistent and unexplained bias in responding toward the right lever developed in the food-maintained, but not the cocaine-maintained monkeys. Considering the present results with those of previous experiments, it appears that food-, but not cocaine-maintained behavior, deviates increasingly from strict matching as the IRI is extended. This difference across reinforcers could be due to differences between cocaine and food in the mechanisms by which they maintain behavior, or a direct effect of cocaine on choice performance.
先前的研究表明,在短可变间隔(VI)时间表下由可卡因维持的并发时间表反应能很好地用广义匹配定律来描述。也就是说,药物维持的行为是根据强化的相对频率来分配的。本实验的目的是检验广义匹配定律解释更长可卡因可得性VI时间表下选择行为的能力,并在这方面比较可卡因维持的行为和食物维持的行为。一组恒河猴(n = 4)植入了留置静脉导管,并被允许在可卡因给药的并发VI(conc VI)时间表(每次注射0.025、0.05或0.1 mg/kg)下做出反应,平均强化间隔(IRI)为10或30分钟。在第二组猴子(n = 4)中,进行了一项类似的实验,但反应是由不同量的食物(一、二或四个1克香蕉味颗粒)维持的。对于两组猴子来说,在任何一个杠杆上做出反应后都会得到相同的强化物,选项之间的唯一区别是VI时间表,即强化频率。广义匹配定律能很好地预测可卡因维持组的行为。虽然两组在反应和时间分配上都表现出不匹配,但行为由食物维持的猴子的杠杆按压比可卡因维持组表现出更多的不匹配。此外,在食物维持组而非可卡因维持组的猴子中,出现了对右杠杆反应的一致且无法解释的偏向。将目前的结果与先前实验的结果相结合,似乎随着IRI的延长,食物维持而非可卡因维持的行为越来越偏离严格匹配。不同强化物之间的这种差异可能是由于可卡因和食物在维持行为的机制上存在差异,或者是可卡因对选择表现的直接影响。