Putzke J D, Williams M A, Daniel F J, Boll T J
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Neurophysiology Laboratory, 35294-4551, USA.
Assessment. 1999 Mar;6(1):61-70. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600107.
This study examined the utility of the K-correction procedure to adjust for a defensive response set on the MMPI. The sample consisted of 61 patients with end-stage lung disease undergoing psychosocial evaluation for transplantation. Participants were separated into defensive and non-defensive groups using a median split on the K scale (defensive group T score 59) as the cutoff score. The MMPI was scored once in the standard manner and then rescored omitting all K-scale items from the clinical scales. As hypothesized, raw score analysis after omitting K-scale items showed the defensive group endorsed significantly fewer items on all five scales involving K-correction (Scales Hs, Pd, Pt, Sc, Ma). Analysis of K-corrected T scores on Scales Hs, Pd, Pt, and Sc using standard procedures showed a significant group difference only on Scale Hs with a higher T score found among the defensive group. The defensive and nondefensive groups were not significantly different in demographic, medical, or psychiatric characteristics suggesting that the tendency to respond in a defensive manner is the major characteristic that distinguishes the two groups. Taken together, these results provide support for the use of the K-correction procedure when examining MMPI clinical profiles among patients with end-stage pulmonary disease undergoing evaluation for transplantation.
本研究考察了K校正程序在调整明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)上的防御性反应定势方面的效用。样本包括61名终末期肺病患者,他们正在接受移植的心理社会评估。使用K量表上的中位数分割(防御组T分数≥59)作为截止分数,将参与者分为防御组和非防御组。MMPI首先以标准方式计分,然后重新计分,从临床量表中省略所有K量表项目。正如所假设的,省略K量表项目后的原始分数分析表明,防御组在涉及K校正的所有五个量表(量表Hs、Pd、Pt、Sc、Ma)上认可的项目明显更少。使用标准程序对量表Hs、Pd、Pt和Sc上的K校正T分数进行分析,结果显示仅在量表Hs上存在显著的组间差异,防御组的T分数更高。防御组和非防御组在人口统计学、医学或精神科特征方面没有显著差异,这表明防御性反应倾向是区分两组的主要特征。综上所述,这些结果为在对接受移植评估的终末期肺病患者进行MMPI临床剖面图检查时使用K校正程序提供了支持。