Bagby R M, Rogers R, Buis T
Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, University of Toronto.
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):191-203. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_2.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the various validity scales and indices on the MMPI-2 to detect malingered (fake-bad), and defensive (fake-good) responding. The entire sample consisted of 165 college students who completed the MMPI-2 under one of three conditions--fake-bad, fake-good, or respond honestly--and 173 forensic inpatients who completed the test as part of a routine evaluation. To detect faking-good and faking-bad, cutting scores for the validity scales and indices were established from the fake-good and fake-bad groups and were compared to the honest and patient groups. Corresponding sensitivity and specificity rates were then determined. Four validity indicators appeared to be moderately effective-at detecting fake-bad profiles: F, F--K, the MMPI-2 version of revised Gough Dissimulation Scale, and Wiener's Obvious-Subtle index, whereas the fake-good indicators were much less effective--only F--K and the Obvious-Subtle index appeared to have moderate utility.
本研究的目的是检验明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版（MMPI - 2）中各种效度量表和指标在检测伪装不良（装病）及防御性（装好）反应方面的有效性。整个样本包括165名大学生，他们在三种条件之一——伪装不良、伪装良好或如实作答——下完成了MMPI - 2测试，以及173名法医住院患者，他们作为常规评估的一部分完成了该测试。为了检测伪装良好和伪装不良，从伪装良好组和伪装不良组中确定了效度量表和指标的切割分数，并与如实作答组和患者组进行比较。然后确定相应的敏感度和特异度。有四个效度指标在检测伪装不良剖面图方面似乎有中等效果：F、F - K、修订后的戈夫掩饰量表的MMPI - 2版本以及维纳的明显-细微指数，而伪装良好指标的效果则差得多——只有F - K和明显-细微指数似乎有中等效用。
