Suppr超能文献

风湿病纵向观察性研究的初步核心领域及报告要求

Preliminary core set of domains and reporting requirements for longitudinal observational studies in rheumatology.

作者信息

Wolfe F, Lassere M, van der Heijde D, Stucki G, Suarez-Almazor M, Pincus T, Eberhardt K, Kvien T K, Symmons D, Silman A, van Riel P, Tugwell P, Boers M

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):484-9.

PMID:9972992
Abstract

Observational and longitudinal observational studies (LOS) provide essential information about the course and outcome of rheumatic disorders that cannot be provided by randomized controlled trials, and they constitute the major clinical scientific communication in rheumatology. There has been no consensus as to the full and appropriate content of LOS. This report defines a core set of domains and reporting requirements for LOS. At the 1998 OMERACT IV Conference a consensus process evaluated the literature of rheumatology in light of the constructs, variables, and outcomes of rheumatology by using introductory lectures, nominal groups, and plenary sessions. The result of this process was to identify 5 "core" domains that should be included in every LOS: Health Status, Disease Process, Damage, Mortality, and Toxicity/Adverse Reactions. Two additional domains, Work Disability and Costs, were recognized as important, but need not be used in all LOS. Eleven subdomains were identified that divided the domains into convenient clinical and conceptual units. A set of reporting requirements was also determined. The core recommendations, which follow on the WHO ICIDH-2 outline, are not disease-specific; the substitution of different "disease process" and "damage" measures make them suitable for many rheumatic disorders. The core set is intended to serve as a core for LOS in almost all rheumatic conditions.

摘要

观察性研究和纵向观察性研究(LOS)提供了有关风湿性疾病病程和结局的重要信息,而这些信息无法通过随机对照试验获得,并且它们构成了风湿病领域主要的临床科学交流方式。对于LOS完整且恰当的内容,目前尚无共识。本报告定义了LOS的一组核心领域和报告要求。在1998年的OMERACT IV会议上,通过使用介绍性讲座、名义小组和全体会议,根据风湿病的结构、变量和结局对风湿病文献进行了共识评估。这一过程的结果是确定了5个每个LOS都应包含的“核心”领域:健康状况、疾病进程、损伤、死亡率以及毒性/不良反应。另外两个领域,即工作残疾和费用,被认为很重要,但并非在所有LOS中都必须使用。确定了11个子领域,这些子领域将各个领域划分为便于临床和概念理解的单元。还确定了一套报告要求。遵循世界卫生组织ICIDH - 2大纲的核心建议并非针对特定疾病;替换不同的“疾病进程”和“损伤”测量方法使它们适用于多种风湿性疾病。该核心集旨在作为几乎所有风湿性疾病中LOS的核心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验