Uggowitzer M M, Kugler C, Riccabona M, Klein G E, Leber K, Simbrunner J, Quehenberger F
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Graz, Austria.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Jan;20(1):101-6.
The purpose of our study was to examine the clinical value of echo-enhanced transcranial power Doppler sonography (EE-TCD), including it ability to assess hemodynamic parameters of the intracranial vasculature, in patients with suspected cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to compare this method with angiography.
Sixteen patients with suspected cerebral AVMs were examined with EE-TCD and angiography. As an echo-enhancing agent, SHU 508A (Levovist) was administered intravenously by bolus injection in nine patients and by continuous infusion in seven. Sonograms were reviewed without knowledge of other imaging results and were correlated with angiographic findings.
Angiography showed AVMs in 12 of 16 patients. Eleven lesions were located in the anterior or middle fossa and one was in the posterior fossa. EE-TCD was slightly less sensitive in the detection of AVMs (92%, 11/12 lesions), since in one patient the lacking acoustic window did not allow a transcranial examination. EE-TCD slightly underestimated AVM size compared with angiographic findings but showed feeding arteries with sufficient acoustic properties. In seven patients (58%), angiography revealed a coincidental blood supply from another intracranial or extracranial vessel, which was missed by EE-TCD in all cases. Assessment of peak systolic velocities and resistive indexes resulted in a higher (mean, 191.1 cm/s) and a lower (mean, 45.7%) value, respectively, in the feeding arteries as compared with the contralateral arteries (mean, 101.8 cm/s and 55.6%, respectively). Side-to-side differences were significantly higher in patients with AVMs than in those without a malformation. Signal enhancement was markedly longer with continuous infusion (mean, 520 seconds +/- 28.2) than with bolus injection (mean, 145 seconds +/- 10.5) of the contrast agent.
In our limited study group, EE-TCD was a sensitive method for the detection of AVMs, and Levovist proved to be a safe and effective echo-enhancing substance.
我们研究的目的是探讨增强回声经颅功率多普勒超声检查(EE-TCD)在疑似脑动静脉畸形(AVM)患者中的临床价值,包括其评估颅内血管系统血流动力学参数的能力,并将该方法与血管造影进行比较。
对16例疑似脑AVM患者进行了EE-TCD和血管造影检查。作为增强回声剂,9例患者通过静脉推注给予SHU 508A(Levovist),7例患者通过持续输注给予。在不知道其他影像学结果的情况下回顾超声图像,并与血管造影结果进行关联。
血管造影显示16例患者中有12例存在AVM。11个病变位于前颅窝或中颅窝,1个位于后颅窝。EE-TCD对AVM的检测敏感性略低(92%,11/12个病变),因为1例患者缺乏声学窗口,无法进行经颅检查。与血管造影结果相比,EE-TCD略微低估了AVM的大小,但显示出具有足够声学特性的供血动脉。7例患者(58%)血管造影显示存在来自另一颅内或颅外血管的巧合供血,所有病例中EE-TCD均未发现。与对侧动脉相比,供血动脉的收缩期峰值速度和阻力指数评估结果分别更高(平均191.1 cm/s)和更低(平均45.7%)(对侧动脉平均分别为101.8 cm/s和55.6%)。AVM患者的左右差异明显高于无畸形患者。与推注造影剂相比,持续输注造影剂时信号增强明显更长(平均520秒±28.2)(推注平均为145秒±10.5)。
在我们有限的研究组中,EE-TCD是检测AVM的一种敏感方法,Levovist被证明是一种安全有效的增强回声物质。