Mast H, Mohr J P, Thompson J L, Osipov A, Trocio S H, Mayer S, Young W L
Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):1024-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.1024.
We sought to investigate (1) the sensitivity of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) for diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and (2) the association of feeding artery flow velocity profiles with spontaneous hemorrhage and focal neurological deficit in AVM patients.
We examined 114 consecutive AVM patients prospectively by TCD; 22 non-AVM patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage and 52 normal subjects served as controls. To estimate the association of blood flow velocity patterns in feeding arteries with spontaneous hemorrhage and focal neurological deficit, the total group of AVM subjects was divided into patients with and without a history of bleeding and also into those with and without clinical signs of "steal" (focal deficit unrelated to hemorrhage).
Sensitivity for large and medium-sized AVMs was high (> 80%), whereas 62% of small AVMs were missed. TCD was also highly sensitive (80%) in a group of five AVM patients with acute hemorrhage. Flow velocity profiles were not related to spontaneous hemorrhage (mean velocity, 111 cm/s in patients with hemorrhage versus 114 cm/s in patients without hemorrhage; P = .65) or clinical signs of steal (mean velocity, 111 cm/s versus 113 cm/s in patients with and without steal, respectively; P = .89).
We concluded that (1) TCD is highly sensitive for large and medium-sized AVMs; (2) in acute cerebral hemorrhage TCD may help to differentiate AVM from non-AVM bleeds; (3) the predictive value of TCD findings for clinical sequelae of AVMs remains undetermined; and (4) the concept of hemodynamic steal in AVMs is not supported by TCD data.
我们试图研究(1)经颅多普勒超声检查(TCD)对脑动静脉畸形(AVM)诊断的敏感性,以及(2)供血动脉血流速度分布与AVM患者自发性出血和局灶性神经功能缺损之间的关系。
我们对114例连续性AVM患者进行了前瞻性TCD检查;22例急性脑出血的非AVM患者和52例正常受试者作为对照。为了评估供血动脉血流速度模式与自发性出血和局灶性神经功能缺损之间的关系,将AVM患者总体分为有出血史和无出血史的患者,以及有和无“盗血”临床体征(与出血无关的局灶性缺损)的患者。
TCD对大中型AVM的敏感性较高(>80%),而62%的小型AVM被漏诊。在一组5例急性出血的AVM患者中,TCD的敏感性也很高(80%)。血流速度分布与自发性出血(出血患者平均速度为111 cm/s,无出血患者为114 cm/s;P = 0.65)或盗血临床体征(有和无盗血患者的平均速度分别为111 cm/s和113 cm/s;P = 0.89)无关。
我们得出以下结论:(1)TCD对大中型AVM高度敏感;(2)在急性脑出血中,TCD可能有助于鉴别AVM出血与非AVM出血;(3)TCD检查结果对AVM临床后遗症的预测价值尚未确定;(4)TCD数据不支持AVM中血液动力学盗血的概念。