Oliver A, Tarragó D, Martínez-Ferrer M, Loza E, Cantón R, Baquero F
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera Colmenar km 9,1, 28034 Madrid.
Rev Esp Quimioter. 1998 Dec;11(4):344-8.
MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.
通过微量稀释法(PASCO)、纸片扩散法和Etest法,对75株连续的肺炎链球菌血培养分离株测定了青霉素、头孢噻肟和红霉素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值及抑菌圈直径。使用Etest法时,分别有40%和29.3%的分离株对青霉素和红霉素表现出低水平或高水平耐药,而9.3%的分离株对头孢噻肟呈中介水平。未发现对头孢噻肟的高水平耐药。微量稀释法和Etest法比较青霉素和头孢噻肟结果时未发现错误,仅分别出现2例(2.7%)和3例(4%)小错误。另一方面,比较纸片扩散法(1mg苯唑西林纸片)和Etest法测定的青霉素敏感性结果时,发现6例(8%)主要错误和18例(24%)小错误。