Suppr超能文献

[肺炎链球菌抗生素敏感性试验中微量稀释法(PASCO)、Etest法和纸片扩散法的比较]

[Comparison of the microdilution method (PASCO), the Etest and disc-diffusion in streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility testing].

作者信息

Oliver A, Tarragó D, Martínez-Ferrer M, Loza E, Cantón R, Baquero F

机构信息

Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera Colmenar km 9,1, 28034 Madrid.

出版信息

Rev Esp Quimioter. 1998 Dec;11(4):344-8.

PMID:9990148
Abstract

MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.

摘要

通过微量稀释法(PASCO)、纸片扩散法和Etest法,对75株连续的肺炎链球菌血培养分离株测定了青霉素、头孢噻肟和红霉素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值及抑菌圈直径。使用Etest法时,分别有40%和29.3%的分离株对青霉素和红霉素表现出低水平或高水平耐药,而9.3%的分离株对头孢噻肟呈中介水平。未发现对头孢噻肟的高水平耐药。微量稀释法和Etest法比较青霉素和头孢噻肟结果时未发现错误,仅分别出现2例(2.7%)和3例(4%)小错误。另一方面,比较纸片扩散法(1mg苯唑西林纸片)和Etest法测定的青霉素敏感性结果时,发现6例(8%)主要错误和18例(24%)小错误。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验