Suppr超能文献

[肺炎链球菌抗生素敏感性试验中微量稀释法(PASCO)、Etest法和纸片扩散法的比较]

[Comparison of the microdilution method (PASCO), the Etest and disc-diffusion in streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility testing].

作者信息

Oliver A, Tarragó D, Martínez-Ferrer M, Loza E, Cantón R, Baquero F

机构信息

Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera Colmenar km 9,1, 28034 Madrid.

出版信息

Rev Esp Quimioter. 1998 Dec;11(4):344-8.

PMID:9990148
Abstract

MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.

摘要

通过微量稀释法(PASCO)、纸片扩散法和Etest法,对75株连续的肺炎链球菌血培养分离株测定了青霉素、头孢噻肟和红霉素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值及抑菌圈直径。使用Etest法时,分别有40%和29.3%的分离株对青霉素和红霉素表现出低水平或高水平耐药,而9.3%的分离株对头孢噻肟呈中介水平。未发现对头孢噻肟的高水平耐药。微量稀释法和Etest法比较青霉素和头孢噻肟结果时未发现错误,仅分别出现2例(2.7%)和3例(4%)小错误。另一方面,比较纸片扩散法(1mg苯唑西林纸片)和Etest法测定的青霉素敏感性结果时,发现6例(8%)主要错误和18例(24%)小错误。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验