Brenner M, McKenna R J, Chen J C, Osann K, Powell L, Gelb A F, Fischel R J, Wilson A F
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Beckman Laser Institute, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92668, USA.
Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):390-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.390.
Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997.
Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model.
Community hospital and university medical center.
We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS.
Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS.
Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L+/-0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L+/-0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85+/-2.3% compared with 83+/-2.4% 1-year survival with "worst case" analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81+/-2.7% by standard analysis vs 76+/-2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (< or = 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (> 0.5, p < 0.03) and PO2 (> 54, p < 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (> 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS.
To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.
尽管有大量关于肺减容手术(LVRS)治疗肺气肿短期疗效的报道,但据我们所知,尚未有长期生存情况的报道。我们描述了在1994年4月至1997年11月的3年半时间里,由一组医生对256例接受双侧吻合器LVRS治疗的患者(n = 236例采用电视辅助胸腔镜手术[VATS]入路,n = 20例采用正中胸骨切开术)的生存情况。
前瞻性生存研究。采用Kaplan-Meier方法研究总生存、按术前表现分层的生存情况以及术后急性反应。使用Cox比例风险模型检验术前预测因素和术后反应变量对生存的联合影响。
社区医院和大学医学中心。
我们研究了256例连续接受LVRS治疗的重度肺气肿患者。
采用VATS进行双侧吻合器LVRS。
截至1998年2月1日,256例患者中有246例的总生存信息确切可知。中位随访时间为623天(范围为0至1545天)。术前平均第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为0.635L±0.015L,术后升至1.068L±0.029L。通过标准分析方法(将失访患者在最后一次接触时进行截尾),1年生存率为85±2.3%,而采用“最坏情况”分析方法(假设所有失访患者均死亡)时1年生存率为83±2.4%。标准分析的2年平均生存率为81±2.7%,最坏情况评估为76±2.9%。年龄较轻(≤70岁,p = 0.02)、基线FEV1较高(>0.5,p < 0.03)和动脉血氧分压(PO2)较高(>54,p < 0.001)的患者生存情况明显更好。术后FEV1短期改善最大(增加>0.56L)的患者在LVRS后的长期生存情况也明显更好。
据我们所知,这是对大量接受双侧吻合器LVRS治疗肺气肿患者的首次长期生存分析。观察到有相当高的长期死亡率,特别是在可识别的高危亚组中。需要与匹配良好的对照患者进行仔细比较,以明确评估LVRS的益处和风险。本研究表明,前瞻性对照试验可能需要根据术前危险因素对患者随机分组进行分层,以获得有意义的结果。