• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧吻合器肺减容手术治疗肺气肿后的生存率。

Survival following bilateral staple lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.

作者信息

Brenner M, McKenna R J, Chen J C, Osann K, Powell L, Gelb A F, Fischel R J, Wilson A F

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Beckman Laser Institute, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92668, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):390-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.390.

DOI:10.1378/chest.115.2.390
PMID:10027437
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997.

DESIGN

Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model.

SETTING

Community hospital and university medical center.

PATIENTS

We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS.

INTERVENTIONS

Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L+/-0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L+/-0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85+/-2.3% compared with 83+/-2.4% 1-year survival with "worst case" analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81+/-2.7% by standard analysis vs 76+/-2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (< or = 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (> 0.5, p < 0.03) and PO2 (> 54, p < 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (> 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.

摘要

研究目的

尽管有大量关于肺减容手术(LVRS)治疗肺气肿短期疗效的报道,但据我们所知,尚未有长期生存情况的报道。我们描述了在1994年4月至1997年11月的3年半时间里,由一组医生对256例接受双侧吻合器LVRS治疗的患者(n = 236例采用电视辅助胸腔镜手术[VATS]入路,n = 20例采用正中胸骨切开术)的生存情况。

设计

前瞻性生存研究。采用Kaplan-Meier方法研究总生存、按术前表现分层的生存情况以及术后急性反应。使用Cox比例风险模型检验术前预测因素和术后反应变量对生存的联合影响。

地点

社区医院和大学医学中心。

患者

我们研究了256例连续接受LVRS治疗的重度肺气肿患者。

干预措施

采用VATS进行双侧吻合器LVRS。

测量与结果

截至1998年2月1日,256例患者中有246例的总生存信息确切可知。中位随访时间为623天(范围为0至1545天)。术前平均第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为0.635L±0.015L,术后升至1.068L±0.029L。通过标准分析方法(将失访患者在最后一次接触时进行截尾),1年生存率为85±2.3%,而采用“最坏情况”分析方法(假设所有失访患者均死亡)时1年生存率为83±2.4%。标准分析的2年平均生存率为81±2.7%,最坏情况评估为76±2.9%。年龄较轻(≤70岁,p = 0.02)、基线FEV1较高(>0.5,p < 0.03)和动脉血氧分压(PO2)较高(>54,p < 0.001)的患者生存情况明显更好。术后FEV1短期改善最大(增加>0.56L)的患者在LVRS后的长期生存情况也明显更好。

结论

据我们所知,这是对大量接受双侧吻合器LVRS治疗肺气肿患者的首次长期生存分析。观察到有相当高的长期死亡率,特别是在可识别的高危亚组中。需要与匹配良好的对照患者进行仔细比较,以明确评估LVRS的益处和风险。本研究表明,前瞻性对照试验可能需要根据术前危险因素对患者随机分组进行分层,以获得有意义的结果。

相似文献

1
Survival following bilateral staple lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.双侧吻合器肺减容手术治疗肺气肿后的生存率。
Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):390-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.390.
2
Survival after unilateral versus bilateral lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.单侧与双侧肺减容手术治疗肺气肿后的生存率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Dec;118(6):1101-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70108-X.
3
Rate of FEV1 change following lung volume reduction surgery.肺减容手术后第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的变化率
Chest. 1998 Mar;113(3):652-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.3.652.
4
Lung volume reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema.弥漫性肺气肿的肺减容手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 14;10(10):CD001001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001001.pub3.
5
A prospective evaluation of lung volume reduction surgery in 200 consecutive patients.对200例患者进行肺减容手术的前瞻性评估。
Chest. 2003 Apr;123(4):1026-37. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.4.1026.
6
Bilateral apical vs nonapical stapling resection during lung volume reduction surgery.肺减容手术中双侧尖段与非尖段吻合器切除术
Chest. 1998 Oct;114(4):981-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.4.981.
7
Lung volume reduction surgery: a cost and outcomes comparison of sternotomy versus thoracoscopy.肺减容手术:胸骨切开术与胸腔镜手术的成本及结果比较
Am Surg. 1998 Oct;64(10):1010-3.
8
Dyspnea response following bilateral thoracoscopic staple lung volume reduction surgery.双侧胸腔镜吻合器肺减容术后的呼吸困难反应
Chest. 1997 Oct;112(4):916-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.4.916.
9
[A national survey of results of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for pulmonary emphysema in Japan].[日本全国范围内肺气肿肺减容手术(LVRS)结果的调查]
Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Sep;42(9):803-9.
10
Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.肺气肿肺减容术后4年的肺功能
Chest. 1999 Dec;116(6):1608-15. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1608.