• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Psychotherapy process in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

作者信息

Ablon J S, Jones E E

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):64-75. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.64.

DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.64
PMID:10028210
Abstract

This study examined psychotherapy process in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Transcripts of brief interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral therapies were rated using the Psychotherapy Process Q Set (PQS), an instrument designed to provide a standard language for describing therapy process. Results demonstrated that there were important areas of overlap and key differences in the process of the treatments. There were important differences in therapist stance, activity, and technique that were consistent with theoretical prescription, but patient characteristics within sessions were quite similar. Patient in-session characteristics as measured by the PQS were related to outcome across the treatment samples. These findings are linked to theoretical models, which may help explain the role of nonspecific factors associated with nondifferential treatment outcome in brief therapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Psychotherapy process in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):64-75. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.64.
2
Validity of controlled clinical trials of psychotherapy: findings from the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.心理治疗对照临床试验的有效性:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 May;159(5):775-83. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.775.
3
National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments.国家心理健康研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目。治疗的总体有效性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):971-82; discussion 983. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002.
4
New analyses of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: do different treatments reflect different processes?新的国家心理健康研究所抑郁症治疗合作研究计划分析:不同的治疗方法是否反映了不同的治疗过程?
Psychother Res. 2013;23(5):514-25. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.800949. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Apr;61(2):306-16. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.2.306.
6
Patient predictors of response to psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy: findings in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.心理治疗和药物治疗反应的患者预测因素:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;148(8):997-1008. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.8.997.
7
The process of change in brief psychotherapy: effects of psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral prototypes.短程心理治疗中的变化过程:精神分析和认知行为原型的影响。
Psychother Res. 2010 Sep;20(5):564-75. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2010.493537.
8
NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Background and research plan.美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗合作研究项目。背景与研究计划。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;42(3):305-16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790260103013.
9
Comparing the treatment process in successful and unsuccessful cases in two forms of psychotherapy for cluster C personality disorders.比较两种针对 C 类人格障碍的心理治疗方法在成功和失败案例中的治疗过程。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2019 Jun;56(2):285-296. doi: 10.1037/pst0000217.
10
Interpersonal factors in brief treatment of depression: further analyses of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.抑郁症简短治疗中的人际因素:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的进一步分析
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):162-71. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.1.162.

引用本文的文献

1
Transference Assessment in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.心理治疗中的移情评估:一项系统综述。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70118. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70118.
2
Assessing Personality Change with Blatt's Anaclitic and Introjective Configurations and Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure Profiles: Two Case Studies in Psychodynamic Treatment.运用布拉特的依恋型和内投型人格结构以及谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序剖面图评估人格变化:心理动力治疗中的两个案例研究
Res Psychother. 2017 Apr 19;20(1):231. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2017.231. eCollection 2017 Apr 13.
3
Patients' Comprehension of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in an Outpatient Clinic for Resistant Depression: A Cross-Sectional Study.
门诊难治性抑郁症患者对正念认知行为疗法的理解:一项横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 12;10:271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00271. eCollection 2019.
4
Embodied Cognition and the Direct Induction of Affect as a Compliment to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy.具身认知与情感的直接诱导:作为认知行为疗法的补充
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Feb 26;8(3):29. doi: 10.3390/bs8030029.
5
Measuring Verbal Psychotherapeutic Techniques-A Systematic Review of Intervention Characteristics and Measures.测量言语心理治疗技术——干预特征与测量方法的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 10;6:1705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01705. eCollection 2015.
6
Observing the determinants of the psychotherapeutic process in depressive disorders. A clinical case study within a psychodynamic approach.观察抑郁症心理治疗过程的决定因素。一项精神动力学方法下的临床案例研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 21;6:477. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00477. eCollection 2015.
7
Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS): a randomised controlled trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment-resistant/treatment-refractory forms of depression.塔维斯托克成人抑郁研究(TADS):针对治疗抵抗/难治性抑郁形式的精神分析心理治疗的随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 11;12:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-60.
8
Effectiveness, relapse prevention and mechanisms of change of cognitive therapy vs. interpersonal therapy for depression: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.认知疗法与人际治疗对抑郁症的疗效、预防复发和作用机制比较:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Jun 14;12:150. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-150.
9
Common factors in empirically supported treatments of borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的实证支持治疗中的共同因素。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011 Feb;13(1):60-8. doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0167-x.
10
Interpersonal accuracy of interventions and the outcome of cognitive and interpersonal therapies for depression.干预的人际准确性与认知和人际治疗抑郁症的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):420-8. doi: 10.1037/a0019549.