Gold M
Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC 20024, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1639-50.
To help researchers better understand Medicaid managed care and the kinds of research studies that will be both feasible and of value to policymakers and program staff. The article builds on our experience researching Medicaid managed care to provide insight for researchers who want to be policy relevant.
We draw four lessons from our work on Medicaid managed care in seven states. First, these are complex programs that differ substantially across states. Second, each program faces common challenges and issues. The need to address common design elements involving program eligibility, managed care and provider contracting, beneficiary enrollment, education, marketing, and administration and oversight provides a vehicle that researchers can use to help understand states and to provide them with relevant insight. Third, well-designed case studies can provide invaluable descriptive insights. Such case studies suggest that providing effective descriptions of state programs and experience, monitoring information on program performance and tradeoffs, and insight on implementation and design are all valuable products of such studies that have considerable potential to be converted into policy-actionable advice. And fourth, some questions demand impact studies but the structure of Medicaid managed care poses major barriers to such studies.
Many challenges confront researchers seeking to develop policy-relevant research on managed care. Researchers need to confront these challenges in turn by developing second-best approaches that will provide timely insight into important questions in a relatively defensible and rigorous way in the face of many constraints. If researchers do not, others will, and researchers may find their contributions limited in important areas for policy debate.
帮助研究人员更好地理解医疗补助管理式医疗以及对于政策制定者和项目工作人员而言既可行又有价值的各类研究。本文基于我们在研究医疗补助管理式医疗方面的经验,为希望其研究与政策相关的研究人员提供见解。
我们从在七个州开展的医疗补助管理式医疗工作中汲取了四点经验教训。其一,这些是复杂的项目,各州之间差异很大。其二,每个项目都面临共同的挑战和问题。处理涉及项目资格、管理式医疗与供应商签约、受益人参保、教育、营销以及管理与监督等常见设计要素的需求,为研究人员提供了一种手段,可借此帮助理解各州情况并为其提供相关见解。其三,精心设计的案例研究能提供极有价值的描述性见解。此类案例研究表明,对州项目及经验进行有效描述、监测项目绩效和权衡取舍的信息以及对实施与设计的见解,都是这类研究的宝贵成果,极有可能转化为可付诸政策行动的建议。其四,一些问题需要进行影响研究,但医疗补助管理式医疗的结构给此类研究带来了重大障碍。
寻求开展与管理式医疗政策相关研究的研究人员面临诸多挑战。研究人员需要依次应对这些挑战,通过制定次优方法,以便在面临诸多限制的情况下,以相对合理且严谨的方式及时洞察重要问题。如果研究人员不这样做,其他人会这样做,而研究人员可能会发现他们在政策辩论的重要领域中的贡献有限。